Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064487›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Pattern of antibiotics use, incidence and predictors of surgical site infections in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.

Ezaedin Halawi, Tamrat Assefa, Sadikalmahdi Hussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ezaedin HalawiDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, P.O.Box:1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tamrat AssefaDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, P.O.Box:1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. tamrat.assefa@aau.edu.et.
Sadikalmahdi HussenDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences, P.O.Box:1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurgical site infections (SSIs) were the most common healthcare-associated infection mainly in developing countries. Inappropriate use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, in terms of antibiotic choice, timing, and duration, can lead to the selection of resistant microorganisms and high costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of antibiotic use, incidence and predictors of SSIs at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

resultsFrom 131 patients, 55.7% were male study participants. Ninety (68.7%) patients received preoperative prophylaxis. Ceftriaxone was the most 76 (84.5%) prescribed agent for prophylaxis. Twenty-seven (20.6%) patients developed surgical site infection. Previous surgery AOR = 3.22 (95% CI [1.14-9.13]) and alcohol use AOR = 7.04 (95% CI [2.56-23.12, p = 0.000]) were independent predictors of SSIs in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Surgical Wound InfectionAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsEthiopiaFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedTertiary Health CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsPre and postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxisTikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital

Identifiers

PMID30064487
PMCPMC6069967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.