ArticleBMC research notes2018
Exploring the differences between the three pyruvate kinase isozymes from Vibrio cholerae in a heterologous expression system.
Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe genome of Vibrio cholerae has three paralog genes encoding for distinct pyruvate kinases. We were interested in elucidating whether they were expressed, and contributed to the pyruvate kinase activity of V. cholerae. VcIPK and VcIIPK were transformed and expressed in BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL strain, whereas VcIIIPK could not be transformed. Those studied did contribute to the pyruvate kinase activity of the bacteria. Therefore, our aim was to find an efficient transformation and commonly used over-expression heterologous system for VcIIIPK and develop its purification protocol.
resultsvcIpk, vcIIpk and vcIIIpk genes were transformed in six different BL21 expression strains. No transformants were obtained for the vcIIIpk gene using BL21(DE3), BL21(DE3)pLysS and BL21(DE3)CodonPlus-RIL strains. Reduced rates of cell growth were observed for BL21-Gold(DE3)pLysS and Origami B(DE3)pLysS. High efficiency of transformation was obtained for BL21-AI. Using this strain, VcIIIPK was purified but proved to be unstable during its purification and storage. Therefore, the transformation of vcIIIpk gene resulted in a toxic, mildly toxic or nontoxic product for these BL21 strains. Despite VcIIPK and VcIIIPK being phylogenetically related, the preservation of the proteins is drastically different; whereas one is preserved during purification and storage, the other is auto-proteolyzed completely in less than a week.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.