Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064454›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Testing the organizational theory of innovation implementation effectiveness in a community pharmacy medication management program: a hurdle regression analysis.

Kea Turner, Justin G Trogdon, Morris Weinberger, Angela M Stover, Stefanie Ferreri, Joel F Farley, Neepa Ray, Michael Patti, Chelsea Renfro, Christopher M Shea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unit-level variation in bed alarm use in US hospitals.Research in nursing & health · 2020
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kea TurnerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA. kea.turner@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7885-0879
Justin G TrogdonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Morris WeinbergerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Angela M StoverDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Stefanie FerreriDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115B Beard Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Joel F FarleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Neepa RayCenter for Medication Optimization through Practice and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2400 Kerr Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Michael PattiDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 115B Beard Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
Chelsea RenfroDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 881 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Christopher M SheaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 1C12013003897Community Pharmacy Foundation 71560NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill UL1TR001111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany state Medicaid programs are implementing pharmacist-led medication management programs to improve outcomes for high-risk beneficiaries. There are a limited number of studies examining implementation of these programs, making it difficult to assess why program outcomes might vary across organizations. To address this, we tested the applicability of the organizational theory of innovation implementation effectiveness to examine implementation of a community pharmacy Medicaid medication management program.

methodsWe used a hurdle regression model to examine whether organizational determinants, such as implementation climate and innovation-values fit, were associated with effective implementation. We defined effective implementation in two ways: implementation versus non-implementation and program reach (i.e., the proportion of the target population that received the intervention). Data sources included an implementation survey administered to participating community pharmacies and administrative data.

resultsThe findings suggest that implementation climate is positively and significantly associated with implementation versus non-implementation (AME = 2.65, p < 0.001) and with program reach (AME = 5.05, p = 0.001). Similarly, the results suggest that innovation-values fit is positively and significantly associated with implementation (AME = 2.17, p = 0.037) and program reach (AME = 11.79, p < 0.001). Some structural characteristics, such as having a clinical pharmacist on staff, were significant predictors of implementation and program reach whereas other characteristics, such as pharmacy type or prescription volume, were not.

conclusionsOur study supported the use of the organizational theory of innovation implementation effectiveness to identify organizational determinants that are associated with effective implementation (e.g., implementation climate and innovation-values fit). Unlike broader environmental factors or structural characteristics (e.g., pharmacy type), implementation climate and innovation-values fit are modifiable factors and can be targeted through intervention-a finding that is important for community pharmacy practice. Additional research is needed to determine what implementation strategies can be used by community pharmacy leaders and practitioners to develop a positive implementation climate and innovation-values fit for medication management programs.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationPharmacistsCommunity Pharmacy ServicesHumansMedicaidMedication Therapy ManagementPharmaciesRegression AnalysisUnited StatesCommunity pharmacyImplementation climateInnovation-values fitMedication managementOrganizational theory

Identifiers

PMID30064454
PMCPMC6069858
OpenAlexW2887153981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.