Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064448›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018

Using principal component analysis to reduce complex datasets produced by robotic technology in healthy participants.

Michael D Wood, Leif E R Simmatis, J Gordon Boyd, Stephen H Scott, Jill A Jacobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael D WoodCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Leif E R SimmatisCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada.
J Gordon BoydCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Stephen H ScottCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Jill A JacobsonDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 318 Craine Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. jill.jacobson@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7794-8543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe KINARM robot produces a granular dataset of participant performance metrics associated with proprioceptive, motor, visuospatial, and executive function. This comprehensive battery includes several behavioral tasks that each generate 9 to 20 metrics of performance. Therefore, the entire battery of tasks generates well over 100 metrics per participant, which can make clinical interpretation challenging. Therefore, we sought to reduce these multivariate data by applying principal component analysis (PCA) to increase interpretability while minimizing information loss.

methodsHealthy right-hand dominant participants were assessed using a bilateral KINARM end-point robot. Subjects (Ns = 101-208) were assessed using 6 behavioral tasks and automated software generated 9 to 20 metrics related to the spatial and temporal aspects of subject performance. Data from these metrics were converted to Z-scores prior to PCA. The number of components was determined from scree plots and parallel analysis, with interpretability considered as a qualitative criterion. Rotation type (orthogonal vs oblique) was decided on a per task basis.

resultsThe KINARM performance data, per task, was substantially reduced (range 67-79%), while still accounting for a large amount of variance (range 70-82%). The number of KINARM parameters reduced to 3 components for 5 out of 6 tasks and to 5 components for the sixth task. Many components were comprised of KINARM parameters with high loadings and only some cross loadings were observed, which demonstrates a strong separation of components.

conclusionsComplex participant data produced by the KINARM robot can be reduced into a small number of interpretable components by using PCA. Future applications of PCA may offer potential insight into specific patterns of sensorimotor impairment among patient populations.

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisRoboticsAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleProprioceptionData reductionEnd-point robotKINARMPrincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID30064448
PMCPMC6069537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.