Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064429›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Inter-provincial inequality of public health services in China: the perspective of local officials' behavior.

Tianxiang Chen, Ying Wang, Xiaoyi Luo, Yuxuan Rao, Lei Hua

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianxiang ChenSchool of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ying WangSchool of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoyi LuoSchool of Law and Business, College of Science & Technology of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Yuxuan RaoCollege of Liberal Art and Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Lei HuaSchool of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. leihuapir@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-3349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter economic reform, China experienced rising public health services inequality between the eastern developed and mid-west undeveloped provinces. The fiscal transfer payment system which aims to shape the disparities was considered inefficient. However, there are only a few studies that address the political reason when analyzing the inter-provincial public health services inequality. And the previous studies did not consider a possible non-linear relationship between the fiscal transfer payments and the inter-provincial public health services equalization.

methodsThis paper argues that the local officials' fanatical pursuit of local economic growth which driven by the Political Promotion Tournament and the polarized fiscal self-sufficiency (fiscal capacities) of local governments are responsible for the inter-provincial inequality of public health services and the inefficiency of fiscal transfer payments. By constructing panel threshold regression models with fiscal self-sufficiency of local governments as threshold variable, this study tries to empirically investigate the optimal level of the local governments' self-sufficiency at which the fiscal transfer payments can effectively promote equalization.

resultsThreshold effects exist between fiscal transfer payments and inter-provincial public health services equalization. The effects on inter-provincial public health services equalization show trends that first increase and then decrease as the fiscal self-sufficiency of local governments increases. And there exist a range of fiscal self-sufficiency between 29.236 and 43.765% or between 28.575 and 45.746% for local governments where the fiscal transfer payments can effectively achieve equalization. Currently, the vast majority of provinces in China remain in the ineffective regime where the fiscal transfer payments are inefficient in shaping inequality.

conclusionsThis paper explains the reason of inequality in public health services and the inefficiency of fiscal transfer payment system from Chinese local officials' behavior aspect, and try to find out an effective solution by focusing on the local government's fiscal capacity. The effective way to narrow the inequality is to establish a flexible tax-sharing system to adjust local governments' fiscal capacities and give local governments with low fiscal self-sufficiency more fiscal resources. The new policy measures recently launched by Chinese central government coincide with our recommendations.

Indexed as

PoliticsChinaFederal GovernmentFinancing, GovernmentHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ExpendituresHumansLocal GovernmentSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesChinaFiscal self-sufficiency of local governmentsFiscal transfer paymentsInter-provincial public health services inequalityLocal officialsPolitical promotion tournamentPublic health services equalization

Identifiers

PMID30064429
PMCPMC6069573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.