Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064390›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Evaluation of an activity monitor for use in pregnancy to help reduce excessive gestational weight gain.

Paul M C Lemmens, Francesco Sartor, Lieke G E Cox, Sebastiaan V den Boer, Joyce H D M Westerink

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04605406 (Daily Step Count and Achieving Goal Gestational Weight Gain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04605406 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Daily Step Count and Achieving Goal Gestational Weight Gain

TypeobservationalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsPregnancy Related
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul M C LemmensPhilips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. paul.lemmens@philips.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-2985
Francesco SartorPhilips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Lieke G E CoxPhilips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Sebastiaan V den BoerPhilips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Joyce H D M WesterinkPhilips Research, High Tech Campus 34, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive weight gain during pregnancy increases the risk for negative effects on mother and child during pregnancy, delivery, and also postnatally. Excessive weight gain can be partially compensated by being sufficiently physically active, which can be measured using activity trackers. Modern activity trackers often use accelerometer data as well as heart rate data to estimate energy expenditure. Because pregnancy affects the metabolism and cardiac output, it is not evident that activity trackers that are calibrated to the general population can be reliably used during pregnancy. We evaluated whether an activity monitor designed for the general population is sufficiently accurate for estimating energy expenditure in pregnant women.

methodsForty pregnant women (age: 30.8 ± 4.7 years, BMI: 25.0 ± 4.0) from all three trimesters performed a 1-h protocol including paced and self-paced exercise activities as well as household activities. We tracked reference energy expenditure using indirect calorimetry and used equivalence testing to determine whether the estimated energy expenditure from the activity monitor was within the limits of equivalence.

resultsOverall we found an averaged underestimation of 10 kcal (estimated energy expenditure was 97% of the reference measurement). The 90% CI for the cumulative total energy expenditure was 94-100%. The activities of self-paced cycling, household activities, stair-walking, and yoga had one of their equivalence boundaries outside a 80-125% range of equivalence; for exercise on a cross-trainer, for self-paced and fixed-pace walking, fixed-paced cycling, and resting, the estimations were within the limits of equivalence.

conclusionsWe conclude that the activity monitor is sufficiently accurate for every-day use during pregnancy. The observed deviations can be accounted for and are acceptable from a statistical and an applied perspective because the positive and negative deviations that we observed cancel out to an accurate average energy expenditure over a day, and estimations during exercise are sufficiently accurate to enable coaching on physical activity. The positive and negative deviations themselves were relatively small. Therefore, the activity monitor can be used to help in preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy by accurately tracking physical activity.

Indexed as

ExerciseAccelerometryAdultCalorimetry, IndirectDimensional Measurement AccuracyEnergy MetabolismFemaleGestational Weight GainHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicOverweightPregnancyPregnancy TrimestersPregnant PeopleWalkingYogaAccelerometerActivity monitorEnergy expenditureHeart rateMETValidation

Identifiers

PMID30064390
PMCPMC6069538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.