Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064384›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Cytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 is a positive prognostic marker in PDAC.

Jan-Paul Gundlach, Charlotte Hauser, Franka Maria Schlegel, Christine Böger, Christian Röder, Christoph Röcken, Thomas Becker, Jan-Hendrik Egberts, Holger Kalthoff, Anna Trauzold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan-Paul GundlachDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Charlotte HauserDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Franka Maria SchlegelInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3 (Haus 17), D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christine BögerDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 14, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christian RöderInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3 (Haus 17), D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph RöckenDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 14, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Thomas BeckerDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik EgbertsDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Holger KalthoffInstitute for Experimental Cancer Research, University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3 (Haus 17), D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Anna TrauzoldDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Germany. atrauzold@email.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4697-556X
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEHochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe death receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 are frequently overexpressed in cancer and there is an emerging evidence for their important role in malignant progression, also in the case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In their canonical localization at the plasma membrane, TRAIL-R1/-R2 may induce cell death and/or pro-inflammatory signaling leading to cell migration, invasion and metastasis. Although, they have repeatedly been found intracellular, in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, their functions in intracellular locations are still not well understood. Likewise, studies dealing with the prognostic relevance of TRAIL-Rs located in particular cellular compartments are very rare. For PDAC, the correlation of nuclear TRAIL-R2 with worse patients' prognosis has been shown recently. Corresponding data on TRAIL-R1 are not available so far.

methodsIn the present study we analyzed the expression of TRAIL-R1 in 106 PDACs and 28 adjacent, peritumoral non-malignant pancreatic ducts with special emphasis on its cytoplasmic and nuclear localization and correlated the immunohistochemical findings with clinico-pathological patient characteristics.

resultsTRAIL-R1 was found in 93.4% of all PDAC samples. Cytoplasmic staining was present with very similar intensity in tumor and normal tissue. In contrast, nuclear TRAIL-R1 staining was significantly stronger in tumor compared to normal tissue (p = 0.006). Interestingly, we found that the number of cells with cytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 staining negatively correlates with tumor grading (p = 0.043). No such correlation could be detected for nuclear TRAIL-R1. Neither, cytoplasmic nor nuclear TRAIL-R1 staining showed a correlation with other clinico-pathological parameter such as pTNM categories. However, Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significantly prolonged median survival of patients with positive cytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 expression in more than 80% of tumor cells compared to patients with tumors containing a smaller quantity of cells positively stained for cytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 (20 vs. 8 months; p = 0.004).

conclusionCytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 is a positive prognostic marker for patients with PDAC. Our findings indicate that loss of cytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 results in recurrent disease with more malignant phenotype thus suggesting anti-tumor activities of cytoplasmic TRAIL-R1 in PDAC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandReceptors, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTNFRSF10A protein, humanDeath receptorImmunhistologyPancreatic cancerTRAIL-R1

Identifiers

PMID30064384
PMCPMC6069838
OpenAlexW2885142819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.