Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064301›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Primary Prostate Cancer.

Gargi Kothari, Andrew Loblaw, Alison C Tree, Nicholas J van As, Drew Moghanaki, Simon S Lo, Piet Ost, Shankar Siva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Gargi Kothari1 Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2419-1898
Andrew Loblaw3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison C Tree1 Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas J van As1 Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Drew Moghanaki4 Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Simon S Lo5 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Piet Ost6 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Shankar Siva2 Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBGhent University Hospital · BESunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Washington · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in males. There are a number of options for patients with localized early stage disease, including active surveillance for low-risk disease, surgery, brachytherapy, and external beam radiotherapy. Increasingly, external beam radiotherapy, in the form of dose-escalated and moderately hypofractionated regimens, is being utilized in prostate cancer, with randomized evidence to support their use. Stereotactic body radiotherapy, which is a form of extreme hypofractionation, delivered with high precision and conformality typically over 1 to 5 fractions, offers a more contemporary approach with several advantages including being non-invasive, cost-effective, convenient for patients, and potentially improving patient access. In fact, one study has estimated that if half of the patients currently eligible for conventional fractionated radiotherapy in the United States were treated instead with stereotactic body radiotherapy, this would result in a total cost savings of US$250 million per year. There is also a strong radiobiological rationale to support its use, with prostate cancer believed to have a low α/β ratio and therefore being preferentially sensitive to larger fraction sizes. To date, there are no published randomized trials reporting on the comparative efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to alternative treatment modalities, although multiple randomized trials are currently accruing. Yet, early results from the randomized phase III study of HYPOfractionated RadioTherapy of intermediate risk localized Prostate Cancer (HYPO-RT-PC) trial, as well as multiple single-arm phase I/II trials, indicate low rates of late adverse effects with this approach. In patients with low- to intermediate-risk disease, excellent biochemical relapse-free survival outcomes have been reported, albeit with relatively short median follow-up times. These promising early results, coupled with the enormous potential cost savings and implications for resource availability, suggest that stereotactic body radiotherapy will take center stage in the treatment of prostate cancer in the years to come.

Indexed as

HumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRandomized Controlled Trials as Topichypofractionationprostate cancerstereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30064301
PMCPMC6069023
OpenAlexW2887837678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.