Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30064094›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2018

Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine.

Marie Bryce, Kayleigh Luscombe, Alan Boyd, Abigail Tazzyman, John Tredinnick-Rowe, Kieran Walshe, Julian Archer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Yonder: Breaking bad news, sleeping tablets, hysterectomy, and responsible officers.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie BryceCollaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Electronic address: marie.bryce@plymouth.ac.uk.
Kayleigh LuscombeCollaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Electronic address: kay.luscombe@aol.co.uk.
Alan BoydAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: alan.boyd@manchester.ac.uk.
Abigail TazzymanAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: abigail.tazzyman@manchester.ac.uk.
John Tredinnick-RoweCollaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Electronic address: john.tredinnick-rowe@plymouth.ac.uk.
Kieran WalsheAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: kieran.walshe@manchester.ac.uk.
Julian ArcherCollaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. Electronic address: julian.archer@plymouth.ac.uk.
University of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2011-04-004Department of Health PR-R9-0114-11002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctors' work and the changing, contested meanings of medical professionalism have long been a focus for sociological research. Much recent attention has focused on those doctors working at the interface between healthcare management and medical practice, with such 'hybrid' doctor-managers providing valuable analytical material for exploring changes in how medical professionalism is understood. In the United Kingdom, significant structural changes to medical regulation, most notably the introduction of revalidation in 2012, have created a new hybrid group, Responsible Officers (ROs), responsible for making periodic recommendations about the on-going fitness to practise medicine of all other doctors in their organisation. Using qualitative data collected in a 2015 survey with 374 respondents, 63% of ROs in the UK, this paper analyses the RO role. Our findings show ROs to be a distinct emergent group of hybrid professionals and as such demonstrate restructuring within UK medicine. Occupying a position where multiple agendas converge, ROs' work expands professional regulation into the organisational sphere in new ways, as well as creating new lines of continuous accountability between the wider profession and the General Medical Council as medical regulator. Our exploration of ROs' approaches to their work offers new insights into the on-going development of medical professionalism, pointing to the emergence of a distinctly regulatory hybrid professionalism shaped by co-existing professional, managerial and regulatory logics, in an era of strengthened governance and complex policy change.

Indexed as

Professional RoleHumansQualitative ResearchQuality Assurance, Health CareState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomMedical professionQualitativeRegulationResponsible OfficersRestratificationRevalidationSurveyUK

Identifiers

PMID30064094
PMCPMC6137071
OpenAlexW2884679759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.