ArticlePloS one2018
First chloroplast genomics study of Phoenix dactylifera (var. Naghal and Khanezi): A comparative analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plastomic insights into the genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships of Macadamia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the first complete mitogenome and plastome of a traditional Chinese medicine Viola diffusa.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Chloroplast Genome Variation and Phylogenetic Relationships of Autochthonous Varieties ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Whole mitochondrial and chloroplast genome sequencing of Tunisian date palm cultivars: diversity and evolutionary relationships.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Recent advances in date palm genomics: A comprehensive review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Chloroplast Genome Sequencing, Comparative Analysis, and Discovery of Unique Cytoplasmic Variants in Pomegranate (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Phytotherapeutic potential and pharmaceutical impact ofJournal of food science and technology · 2020Review
- Expanded inverted repeat region with large scale inversion in the first complete plastid genome sequence of Plantago ovata.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Organellar Genomes and Nuclear Internal Transcribed Spacers in the Tertiary Relict GenusFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Genomic Insights into Date Palm Origins.Genes · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is one of the oldest fruit crops in the arid regions of the Middle East. However, little information is available regarding its plastid genomes. In this study, we sequenced the chloroplast (cp) genomes of two economically important but genomically unexplored date palm cultivars of Phoenix dactylifera (var. Naghal and Khanezi). The data assembly and genome annotation revealed a typical quadripartite structure similar to Arecaceae, and the genome sizes of Naghal and Khanezi were 158,210 bp and 158,211 bp, respectively. Structurally, both cp genomes were comprised of four regions: a pair of inverted repeats (27,273 bp for Khanezi and for Naghal 27,272 bp), a large single-copy region (86,090 bp and 86,092 bp) and a small single-copy region (17,575 bp and 17,574 bp). Both genomes had 138 representative genes, whereas 227 and 229 randomly distributed microsatellites were also observed in Khanezi and Naghal, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on the whole cp genomes and 68 shared genes showed identical phylogenetic trees of Khanezi and Naghal forming clades with Khalas and Aseel cultivars, respectively. The current study showed detailed comparative cp genome analysis, which could be essential for broader population genetics and molecular studies of these four date palm cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.