Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30063730›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Towards sustainable aquafeeds: Evaluating substitution of fishmeal with lipid-extracted microalgal co-product (Nannochloropsis oculata) in diets of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).

Pallab K Sarker, Anne R Kapuscinski, Ashley Y Bae, Emily Donaldson, Alexander J Sitek, Devin S Fitzgerald, Oliver F Edelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation of Biorefinery Products FromAquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Towards Sustainable Aquafeeds: Microalgal (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Spirulina-enriched Substrate to Rear Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Improving the feasibility of aquaculture feed by using microalgae.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  17. Apparent Digestibility of Macronutrients and Fatty Acids from Microalgae (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  18. Biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Effects and Safe Inclusion of Narbonne Vetch (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pallab K SarkerEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9433-9061
Anne R KapuscinskiEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Ashley Y BaeEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Emily DonaldsonEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Alexander J SitekEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Devin S FitzgeraldEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Oliver F EdelsonEnvironmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae companies increasingly seek markets for defatted biomass that is left over after extracting omega-3 rich oil for human nutraceuticals and crude oil for fuels. Such a protein-rich co-product is a promising alternative to unsustainably sourced fishmeal in aquaculture diets. We report the first evaluation of co-product of the marine microalga Nannochloropsis oculata (N. oculata co-product) for replacing fishmeal in diets of Nile tilapia, a globally important aquaculture species. We conducted a nutrient digestibility experiment with N. oculata dried whole cells and N. oculata co-product, followed by an 84-day nutritional feeding experiment with N. oculata co-product. N. oculata co-product, more nutrient-dense than whole cells, had the highest digestibility for lysine, an essential amino acid that is often deficient in terrestrial crop meals; and for 20:5 n-3 EPA, making it a good option for EPA supplementation in tilapia feed. N. oculata co-product, despite containing higher amounts of protein than whole cells, had significantly lower digestibility for crude protein than whole cells. Apparent digestibility coefficients (ADC) of methionine were significantly lower in N. oculata co-product than in whole cells. The nutritional feeding experiment compared diets with N. oculata co-product that replaced fishmeal as follows: 0% replacement in reference diet (fishmeal as 7% of total diet) and test diets with 33%, 66% and 100% replacement of fishmeal (3%, 5.5%, and 8% of total diet, respectively). Results showed the 33% replacement diet yielded fish growth, feed conversion, and survival similar to the reference diet. Reduced digestibility and growth at greater N. oculata co-product inclusion levels may have been due to higher levels of anti-nutrients in co-product than whole cells. All diets yielded a n3:n6 ratio of tilapia fillet that is favorable for human consumption. Depositions of macro minerals and several trace elements in the fillet were not significantly different across diets. Thus, N. oculata co-product, when replacing 33% of fishmeal in tilapia feed, led to fish performance and flesh composition comparable to that of fish fed the reference diet, but its nutrient digestibility needs to be improved to achieve higher replacement levels.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFisheriesAnimalsMicroalgaeStramenopilesTilapia

Identifiers

PMID30063730
PMCPMC6067735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.