SynthesisAJR. American journal of roentgenology2018
Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Detection of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2020Pooled it
- ERN GENTURIS cancer surveillance guideline for individuals with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome (PHTS).European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Multimodality Imaging Features of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is fat quantification based on proton density fat fraction useful for differentiating renal tumor types?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Demographics, Survival Analysis, Racial Disparities, and Genomic Landscape.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2023Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of Multiparametric MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Scores in Solid Indeterminate Small Renal Masses.Radiology · 2022Article
- Review
- How We Do It: Managing the Indeterminate Renal Mass with the MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score.Radiology · 2022Review
- Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Imaging protocols for renal multiparametric MRI and MR urography: results of a consensus conference from the French Society of Genitourinary Imaging.European radiology · 2020Article
- An overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of solid and cystic renal lesions.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Review
- Personalized Treatment for Small Renal Tumors: Decision Analysis of Competing Causes of Mortality.Radiology · 2019Article
- Computed Tomography Imaging Characteristics of Histologically Confirmed Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma-Implications for Ancillary Imaging.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MRI in differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from other renal masses. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed searches of three electronic databases for studies that used MRI techniques to differentiate papillary RCC from other renal lesions. Methodologic quality was assessed, and diagnostic test accuracy was summarized using bivariate random-effects modeling or with construction of a summary ROC (SROC) curve.
resultsThirteen studies involving 275 papillary RCC lesions and 758 other renal masses met the inclusion criteria. Resulting summary estimates for the performance of MRI to differentiate papillary RCC from other renal lesions were a sensitivity of 79.6% (95% CI, 62.3-90.2%) and specificity of 88.1% (95% CI, 80.1-93.1%). In subgroup analysis, quantitative pooling of seven studies using enhancement in the corticomedullary phase resulted in a sensitivity of 85.6% (95% CI, 67.8-94.4%), specificity of 91.7% (95% CI, 76.0-97.5%), and area under the SROC curve of 0.894. Four studies used tumor appearance on T2-weighted imaging to detect papillary RCC, and results showed a pooled sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI, 73.0-96.7%) and specificity of 84.9% (95% CI, 69.0-93.4%). Three studies used signal loss on T1-weighted in-phase imaging to detect papillary RCC but marked heterogeneity precluded pooling.
conclusionMeta-analysis supports moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity of quantitative enhancement in the corticomedullary phase for differentiating papillary RCC from other tumors. The accuracy of combining enhancement and T2 signal-intensity characteristics merits further evaluation as a potential aid for management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.