Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30063304›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2018

Acute and Longer-Term Outcomes Using Ketamine as a Clinical Treatment at the Yale Psychiatric Hospital.

Samuel T Wilkinson, Rachel B Katz, Mesut Toprak, Ryan Webler, Robert B Ostroff, Gerard Sanacora

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ketamine, Dissociation, and Depression: What Is "Special" About Ketamine? (Revisited).The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  17. The why, when, where, how, and so what of so-called rapidly acting antidepressants.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ketamine for depressive symptoms: A retrospective chart review of a private ketamine clinic.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel T WilkinsonYale Depression Research Program, Yale School of Medicine, 100 York St, STE 2J, New Haven, CT 06511. samuel.wilkinson@yale.edu.
Rachel B KatzDepartment of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Mesut ToprakDepartment of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Ryan WeblerDepartment of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Robert B OstroffDepartment of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Gerard SanacoraDepartment of Psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine and the Yale Psychiatric Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Research Training in Functional Disability InterventionsT32MH062994 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MORRIS D. · 2002 to 2017
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH111000NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH062994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveKetamine has emerged as a rapid-acting antidepressant, though controversy remains whether sufficient data exist to justify its use outside of research protocols. In October 2014, the authors' institution began providing ketamine as an off-label therapy on a case-by-case basis for patients unable to participate in research protocols. Here, the participant experience during 29 months of providing ketamine as a clinical treatment for severe and treatment-resistant mood disorders through February 2017 is described.

methodsPatients were initially treated with a single- or double-infusion protocol (0.5 mg/kg for 40 minutes intravenously) and were later transitioned to a 4-infusion protocol over 2 weeks.

resultsFifty-four patients received ketamine, with 518 total infusions performed. A subset of 44 patients with mood disorders initiated the 4-infusion protocol, of whom 45.5% responded and 27.3% remitted by the fourth infusion. A subsample (n = 14) received ketamine on a long-term basis, ranging from 12 to 45 total treatments, over a course of 14 to 126 weeks. No evidence was found of cognitive decline, increased proclivity to delusions, or emergence of symptoms consistent with cystitis in this subsample.

conclusionsIn general, ketamine infusions were tolerated well. The response and remission rates in this clinical sample were lower than those observed in some research protocols. The small number of patients who were treated on a maintenance schedule limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the long-term safety of ketamine; however, no long-term adverse effects were observed in this sample.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHospitals, PsychiatricHospitals, UniversityHumansKetamineMaleMiddle AgedMood DisordersTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsKetamine

Identifiers

PMID30063304
PMCPMC6296748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.