Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062970›Full record

ArticleCurrent HIV research2018

Structural Barriers to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Sexual Minority Men: The P18 Cohort Study.

Jessica Jaiswal, Marybec Griffin, Stuart N Singer, Richard E Greene, Ingrid Lizette Zambrano Acosta, Saara K Kaudeyr, Farzana Kapadia, Perry N Halkitis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current HIV research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Discrimination and misconceptions about human immunodeficiency virus among gay and bisexual men.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica JaiswalCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Marybec GriffinCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Stuart N SingerCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Richard E GreeneCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Ingrid Lizette Zambrano AcostaCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Saara K KaudeyrCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Farzana KapadiaCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
Perry N HalkitisCenter for Health, Identity, Behavior & Prevention Studies, New York University, 715 Broadway, New York, NY 10012, United States.
New York University · US

Funding

Syndemic Production in Emergent Adult MenR01DA025537 · NIDA · RBHS-SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HALKITIS, PERRY N · 2009 to 2018
$6.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite decreasing rates of HIV among many populations, HIV-related health disparities among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men persist, with disproportional percentages of new HIV diagnoses among racial and ethnic minority men. Despite increasing awareness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP use remains low. In addition to exploring individual-level factors for this slow uptake, structural drivers of PrEP use must also be identified in order to maximize the effectiveness of biomedical HIV prevention strategies.

methodUsing cross-sectional data from an ongoing cohort study of young sexual minority men (N=492), we examine the extent to which structural-level barriers, including access to health care, medication logistics, counseling support, and stigma are related to PrEP use.

resultsWhile almost all participants indicated awareness of PrEP, only 14% had ever used PrEP. PrEP use was associated with lower concerns about health care access, particularly paying for PrEP. Those with greater concerns talking with their provider about their sexual behaviors were less likely to use PrEP.

conclusionPaying for PrEP and talking to one's provider about sexual behaviors are concerns for young sexual minority men. In particular, stigma from healthcare providers poses a significant barrier to PrEP use in this population. Providers need not only to increase their own awareness of and advocacy for PrEP as an effective risk-management strategy for HIV prevention, but also must work to create open and non-judgmental spaces in which patients can discuss sexual behaviors without the fear of stigma.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityProcedures and Techniques UtilizationSexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial StigmaCross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousHIV InfectionsHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisYoung Adultcliniciansdiversehealthcare providersPre-exposure ProphylaxisPrEPstigmastructural barriers.

Identifiers

PMID30062970
PMCPMC8893045
OpenAlexW2886500835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.