Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062969›Full record

ArticleCurrent HIV research2018

PrEP Eligibility and Interest Among Clinic- and Community-Recruited Young Black Women in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

J M Sales, R J Steiner, J L Brown, A Swartzendruber, A S Patel, A N Sheth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current HIV research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J M SalesRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States.
R J SteinerRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States.
J L BrownCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
A SwartzendruberCollege of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States.
A S PatelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States.
A N ShethDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States.

Funding

HIV Prevention Maintenance for African American Teens ContinuationR01MH070537 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DICLEMENTE, RALPH J · 2003 to 2012
$6.8M
Reducing Alcohol-Related HIV Risk in African American FemalesR01AA018096 · NIAAA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DICLEMENTE, RALPH J, MONAHAN, JENNIFER L · 2010 to 2014
$3.8M
Characterization and modulation of mucosal immunity for HIV prevention in womenK23AI114407 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SHETH, ANANDI NAYAN · 2014 to 2018
$898k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018096NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI114407NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtlanta has been identified as an HIV "hot spot" for Black women and ranks 5th in the US with new infections. Yet little is known about PrEP eligibility or interest among young Black women in Atlanta.

methodsA convenience sample of 1,261 Black women (ages 14-24 years) were recruited from two settings: community venues and sexual health clinics. They provided self-reported sexual behavior data and specimens for laboratory testing for chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) infections. For each woman, the number of key self-reported behavioral HIV risk factors was calculated (0-6 factors for the clinic sample, 0-3 factors for the community sample). A single item assessed PrEP interest in the community sample only.

resultsBacterial STI positivity, an indicator for PrEP eligibility, was 20.5% (17.1% CT, 6.3% GC) and 20.9% (18.8% CT, 5.2% GC) for the clinic and community samples, respectively. Of the 144 STI positive women from the clinic sample, 20.1% reported no behavioral risk indicators and 47.2% reported > 2 behavioral indicators. Of the 117 STI positive women from the community sample, 21.4% reported no behavioral risk indicators. 60.7% of the community sample reported they would be likely or very likely to use PrEP if available.

conclusionYoung Black women in Atlanta, whether sampled from community or sexual health settings, are at substantial risk for HIV infection and meet several PrEP eligibility criteria. Scaling up PrEP among women in Atlanta could have significant implications for HIV in this high burden region.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorAdolescentBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleGeorgiaHIV InfectionsHumansPre-Exposure ProphylaxisYoung AdultBlack or African AmericanchlamydiagonorrheaPrEPUnited Stateswomen.

Identifiers

PMID30062969
PMCPMC6352727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.