Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062669›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2019

The comparison of the 1972 Hodkinson's Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and its variants in screening for cognitive impairment.

Karolina Piotrowicz, Wojciech Romanik, Anna Skalska, Barbara Gryglewska, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Jarosław Derejczyk, Roger M Krzyżewski, Tomasz Grodzicki, Jerzy Gąsowski

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhanced Rehabilitation Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training with EksoNR Lower Extremity Exoskeleton in 19 Stroke Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Observational
  14. Determinants of Physical Activity in Older Adults in South-Eastern Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Risk evaluation of cognitive impairment in patients with heart failure: A call for action.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Abbreviated Mental Test Score; Is There a Need for a Contemporaneous Update?Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karolina PiotrowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 10, Śniadeckich St., 31-351, Kraków, Poland.
Wojciech RomanikII Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Central Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna SkalskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 10, Śniadeckich St., 31-351, Kraków, Poland.
Barbara GryglewskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 10, Śniadeckich St., 31-351, Kraków, Poland.
Katarzyna SzczerbińskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 10, Śniadeckich St., 31-351, Kraków, Poland.
Jarosław DerejczykJohn Paul II Geriatric Hospital, Katowice, Poland.
Roger M KrzyżewskiDepartment of Neursurgery and Neurotraumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Tomasz GrodzickiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 10, Śniadeckich St., 31-351, Kraków, Poland.
Jerzy GąsowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 10, Śniadeckich St., 31-351, Kraków, Poland. jerzy.gasowski@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-5323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince its introduction by Hodkinson in 1972, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and its English and other language versions have been widely used in research and clinical practice alike. However, whether the various versions of AMTS yield equivalent information has never been tested.

methodsWe performed cross-sectional assessment of inpatients aged 65+ years with seven AMTS versions and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) after correction for age and education (MMSEc). We used the MMSEc cut-off score of < 24 as comparator and fitted linear regression models from which we obtained the receiver operating characteristics, and further compared the c-statistics obtained for each version of AMTS. We used Spearman's correlation to check the relation between different AMTS versions.

resultsThe mean (SD) age of 72 (52.8% women) patients was 76.2 (7.6) years. The average time spent on education was 11.3 (3.5) years. The AMTS score across versions varied between 7.4 (2.0) and 8.2 (1.7). The MMSE averaged 24.1 (4.6) and the MMSEc averaged 25.2 (4.1). We found that the c-statistic across AMTS versions with dichotomised MMSEc as comparator ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 and did not significantly differ from the c-statistic of 0.87 for original AMTS (all p > 0.16). We found AMTS versions to be significantly correlated (all r between 0.83 and 0.99, all p < 0.0001).

conclusionsWe found AMTS to be a reliable and useful tool in the screening for possible cognitive impairment. This seems to be true irrespective of whether we use the original test or any of its studied modifications.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsROC CurveAMTSCognitive impairmentMental testMMSEValidation

Identifiers

PMID30062669
PMCPMC6439164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.