Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2018

"If I'd Known …"-a Theory-Informed Systematic Analysis of Missed Opportunities in Optimising Use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy and Accessing Relevant Support: a Qualitative Study.

Aleksandra Herbec, Ildiko Tombor, Lion Shahab, Robert West

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predictors of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Adherence: Mixed-Methods Research With a Convergent Parallel Design.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra HerbecDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. aaherbec@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-7214
Ildiko TomborDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Robert WestDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
University College London · GBDepartment of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/59/30649Cancer Research UK C1417/A22962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is often used suboptimally by smokers. Previous research has focused on cognitions and attitudes as potential reasons. This study drew on theoretical frameworks of behaviour to comprehensively explore smokers' NRT use to identify new intervention targets.

methodsSemi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 16 adult UK-based smokers and ex-smokers who used NRT in recent quit attempts (mean (SD) age = 34.9(10.3); 82.3% women). The COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour) model and the theoretical domains framework informed the interviews and analyses. Data were analysed in NVivo 11.

resultsTwo related behaviours were identified relevant to NRT use: use of NRT per se and engaging with information and support with NRT use. A meta-theme of "missed opportunity" identified instances when smokers did not or could not engage in these behaviours. For use of NRT per se, these included limited knowledge, poor technique of use, low motivation to optimise use, and lack of role models. For engaging with information and support, they included low awareness of optimal use techniques, selective information-seeking, low expectations, limited exposure to guidelines, deficient advice from healthcare professionals, and suboptimal product display. Prior suboptimal experience tended to negatively affect subsequent use and views. Participants were interested in accessible and comprehensive guidelines on NRT and its use.

conclusionsThere appear to be important missed opportunities for optimal use of NRT both in terms of use itself and engagement with information on optimal use. These missed opportunities arise from a range of capability, motivational, and opportunity-related factors.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMotivationQualitative ResearchSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationSocial SupportTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTreatment RefusalAdherenceCOM-BNicotine replacement therapyPharmacotherapyQualitative studySmoking cessationTDF

Identifiers

PMID30062656
PMCPMC6182503
OpenAlexW2886434315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.