Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062655›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019

Reliability of cuff pressure gauges.

Julien Raft, Anne-Sophie Lamotte, Bruno Maury, Isabelle Clerc-Urmès, Cédric Baumann, Philippe Richebé, Hervé Bouaziz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disposable Airway Pressure Manometers for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julien RaftDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montréal, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415 Boulevard de l'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada. julien.raft@free.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5019-3275
Anne-Sophie LamotteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Institut of Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, University of Lorraine, 6, Avenue de Bourgogne, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Bruno MauryBiomedical Engineering, Cancer Institut of Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, University of Lorraine, 6, Avenue de Bourgogne, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Isabelle Clerc-UrmèsClinical Research Support Facility PARC, UMDS, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Cédric BaumannClinical Research Support Facility PARC, UMDS, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Philippe RichebéDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montréal, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, 5415 Boulevard de l'Assomption, Montreal, QC, H1T 2M4, Canada.
Hervé BouazizDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Nancy, 29, Avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 54035, Nancy Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuff pressure gauges are the only recommended instrument to perform controls on endotracheal tube cuff pressure during anesthesia. No calibration is mandatory for these devices. The aim of this study was to describe the level of conformity of various cuff pressure gauges. The single-center measurements were performed with a cuff pressure calibrator on all cuff pressure gauges that were usually used in the operating room. Seven measurements (repeat three times) on each cuff pressure gauges at different levels of pressures (i.e. 0, 10, 20, 27, 30, 40 and 50 cmH

Indexed as

AnesthesiaCalibrationEquipment DesignHumansIntubation, IntratrachealManometryOperating RoomsPressureReproducibility of ResultsRespirationTracheaCalibratorManometryReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.