ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019
Minimally invasive treatment for fractures of lower extremity amputees using a rapid reductor.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traction methods in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of femur shaft fractures: the double reverse traction repositor or manual traction.International orthopaedics · 2021Trial
- Novel, non-invasive technique for fracture reduction in rare pertrochanteric femur fractures in patients with ipsilateral above-knee amputation: a technical report.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Equilibrium Mechanics in Fracture Reduction of Tibial Plateau.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- The Application of Bidirectional Rapid Reductor in Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Case Series.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical effect of closed reduction minimally invasive fixation in intra-articular comminuted fractures of the femoral condyle.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- A new surgical strategy for the treatment of tibial pilon fractures with MIPO facilitated by double reverse traction repositor.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clinical Application Study of Minimally Invasive Double-Reverse Traction in Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Double fractures of the femur: a review of 16 patients.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021Review
- Intramedullary nail for the surgical treatment of unstable fractures of the femur in previously amputated patientsRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2021Article
- Application of a double reverse traction repositor in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of distal femur fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA traction table is recommended for lower limb fractures, while it is unavailable for amputees to immobilize the ipsilateral foot to remain stationary and reduce the fracture. For these patients, our rapid reductor can be applied to guarantee stable fixation and optimal reduction, allowing satisfactory implant positioning. This study aims to evaluate the prognosis of amputee patients with lower limb fractures treated by minimally invasive techniques that employ a rapid reductor to reduce the fracture.
methodsBetween 2013 and 2014, 11 cases of amputees suffering from a lower limb fracture were enrolled in the study, including four transtibial amputees with a tibial plateau fracture, three transtibial amputees with a femoral shaft fracture, and four transfemoral amputees with a femoral neck fracture. All fractures involved the amputated ipsilateral lower limbs, which were all reduced in a closed fashion using a rapid reductor. During the operation, the rapid reductor was connected to the injured limb for skeleton traction to reduce the fracture and then used to maintain the reduction for subsequent minimally invasive fixation. The operation time, reduction time, fluoroscopy time, and intra-operative blood loss were recorded. Follow-ups were conducted to evaluate the union of the fractures and the functional recovery.
resultsAll 11 cases were treated successfully using this minimally invasive technique, with anatomical or nearly anatomical reduction reached in all fractures. The average operative time, reduction time, fluoroscopy time, and intra-operative blood loss were 60 minutes (range, 46-90 minutes), 13.2 minutes (range, 7-20 minutes), 19.8 seconds (range, 6-65 seconds), and 95 mL (range, 80-170 mL), respectively. No incidents of reductor-induced complications occurred during the operation. Patients were followed up for an average of 20.8 months (range, 18-24 months). All fractures healed well on an average of six months. At the latest follow-up, all 11 cases reported satisfactory functional recovery of the fixed limbs, which were similar to that before the fractures.
conclusionsThe rapid reductor can be used to efficiently reduce and maintain ipsilateral fractures of the amputated lower extremity in a closed fashion, which can facilitate minimally invasive fixation of the fractures. The patients can achieve excellent outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30062567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.