ArticleAnatomical science international2019
Investigating interindividual variations in cortical bone quality: analysis of the morphotypes of secondary osteons and their population densities in the human femoral diaphysis.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interdisciplinarity of secondary osteons: relevance of bioarchaeological and palaeontological research in biomedical cortical bone histology studies.Bone reports · 2026Review
- A 50-year perspective on the use and potential of artiodactyl calcanei in bone adaptation studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Histomorphometric method for age-at-death estimation using the anterior side of the femoral midshaftJournal of archaeological science, reports · 2025Article
- Bone of contention: Intra-element variability in remodelling of human femora based on histomorphometric and isotope analyses.PloS one · 2024Article
- Long-Term Cola Intake Does Not Cause Evident Pathological Alterations in the Femoral Bone Microstructure: An Animal Study in Adult Mice.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Morphological divergence in the curvature of human femoral diaphyses: Tracing the central mass distributions of cross-sections.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteons are the primary sites of cortical bone lesions. However, many aspects of osteon microstructure remain poorly understood. This study aimed to explores interindividual differences in the osteon morphotype distributions in the human femoral diaphysis by evaluating the secondary osteon distributions in samples from human femurs. Two anonymized bone fragments from two modern Japanese femurs were examined. Twelve continuous transverse femoral diaphysis specimens were prepared from each fragment. Imaging examinations were conducted using a circularly polarized light microscope, and cross-sectional images were rendered using graphical synthesis software. Osteons in the images were identified as either bright-type osteons, dark-type osteons, or an others type. The two femurs were compared, and the secondary osteon morphotype distributions in different regions of their cross-sections were analyzed. When the two femurs were compared, significant differences in osteon density were observed in some regions and cross-sections. The dark-type osteon presence was strongest in the anterior and posterior regions of the femurs. The analytical method used in this study was found to be able to evaluate osteon microstructure. The results suggest that examining additional specimens and analyzing the biomechanical underpinnings of interindividual differences in osteon distribution patterns may help to improve our understanding of osteon microstructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.