Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062395›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2018

First evaluation of PET-based human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of

Ashwin V Venkataraman, Nicholas Keat, James F Myers, Samuel Turton, Inge Mick, Roger N Gunn, Eugenii A Rabiner, Jan Passchier, Christine A Parker, Robin J Tyacke and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Imidazoline-I2 PET Tracers in Neuroimaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Assessing Reactive Astrogliosis withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. First-in-Humans Evaluation ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashwin V VenkataramanNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. a.venkataraman@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-1948
Nicholas KeatImanova Limited, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Burlington Danes Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
James F MyersNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Samuel TurtonNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Inge MickNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Roger N GunnImanova Limited, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Burlington Danes Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Eugenii A RabinerImanova Limited, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Burlington Danes Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Jan PasschierImanova Limited, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Burlington Danes Building, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Christine A ParkerNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Robin J TyackeNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
David J NuttNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, 5th Floor Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital campus, 160 Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01307X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe measured whole body distribution of

methodsA single bolus injection of

resultsThe highest measured activity concentration was in the kidney and spleen. The longest residence time was in the muscle at 0.100 ± 0.023 h, followed by the liver at 0.067 ± 0.015 h and lungs at 0.052 ± 0.010 h. The highest mean organ absorbed dose was within the heart wall (0.028 ± 0.002 mGy/MBq), followed by the kidneys (0.026 ± 0.005 mGy/MBq). The critical organ was the heart wall. The total mean effective dose averaged over subjects was estimated to be 0.0056 ± 0.0004 mSv/MBq for an injection of

conclusionsThe biodistribution of

Indexed as

11C-BU99008BiodistributionDosimetryImidazoline2Positron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID30062395
PMCPMC6066589
OpenAlexW2885376240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.