Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30062133›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2018

The expression of the cancer testis antigen MAGE A4: A favorable prognostic biomarker in salivary gland carcinomas related to low tumor grading.

Domenic Vital, Kristian Ikenberg, Holger Moch, Matthias Roessle, Gerhard F Huber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Domenic VitalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0967-934X
Kristian IkenbergDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Holger MochDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Matthias RoessleUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Gerhard F HuberDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Kantonsspital St. Gallen St. Gallen Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAim was to analyze the expression of different cancer testis antigens (CTA) and to assess its prognostic value in salivary gland carcinomas.

methodsPatients with salivary gland carcinomas diagnosed 1994 to 2010 were included. Baseline characteristics, pathohistological, clinical, and outcome data were assessed. Tissue microarrays were constructed and immunohistochemistry for different CTA (NY-ESO1, NY-BR1, MAGE A1, MAGE A3, MAGE A4, MAGE C1/CT7, and MAGE C2/CT10) was performed. CTA expression was assessed and statistically correlated with pathological and outcome data.

resultsExpression rates of CTA in salivary gland tumors ranged from 0% to 40%. MAGE A4 expression was associated with a lower tumor grade tumor grading (

conclusionsMAGE A4 is a highly significant prognostic marker in salivary gland carcinoma; its expression is associated with low-grade histology, a low rate of distant metastasis and a favorable survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Indexed as

Cancer testis antigenMAGE A4outcomeprognostic markersalivary gland carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30062133
PMCPMC6057220
OpenAlexW2799929954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.