Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061927›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2018

Adaptive laboratory evolution of cadmium tolerance in

Chunxiao Xu, Tao Sun, Shubin Li, Lei Chen, Weiwen Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Isolation ofACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent progress in adaptive laboratory evolution of industrial microorganisms.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunxiao Xu1Laboratory of Synthetic Microbiology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 People's Republic of China.
Tao Sun1Laboratory of Synthetic Microbiology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 People's Republic of China.
Shubin Li1Laboratory of Synthetic Microbiology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 People's Republic of China.
Lei Chen1Laboratory of Synthetic Microbiology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 People's Republic of China.
Weiwen Zhang1Laboratory of Synthetic Microbiology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 People's Republic of China.
Tianjin University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCadmium has been a significant threat to environment and human health due to its high toxicity and wide application in fossil-fuel burning and battery industry. Cyanobacteria are one of the most dominant prokaryotes, and the previous studies suggested that they could be valuable in removing Cd

resultsIn this study, a robust strain of

conclusionsThe work here identified six genes and their mutations related to Cd

Indexed as

Adaptive laboratory evolutionCadmiumCross toleranceCyanobacteriaGenome re-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30061927
PMCPMC6058365
OpenAlexW2884123743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.