Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061809›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Rhesus Monkeys (

Henkjan Honing, Fleur L Bouwer, Luis Prado, Hugo Merchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Critical Review on the Development and Evolution of Beat Perception.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Core systems of music perception.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Isochrony and rhythmic interaction in ape duetting.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Music and Brain Circuitry: Strategies for Strengthening Evidence-Based Research for Music-Based Interventions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Music in the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Vocal learning as a preadaptation for the evolution of human beat perception and synchronization.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Rhythmic abilities in humans and non-human animals: a review and recommendations from a methodological perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Mapping between sound, brain and behaviour: four-level framework for understanding rhythm processing in humans and non-human primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Vocal learning and flexible rhythm pattern perception are linked: Evidence from songbirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Human Genomics and the Biocultural Origin of Music.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henkjan HoningAmsterdam Brain and Cognition, Institute for Advanced Study, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Fleur L BouwerAmsterdam Brain and Cognition, Institute for Advanced Study, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Luis PradoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico.
Hugo MerchantDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charles Darwin suggested the perception of rhythm to be common to all animals. While only recently experimental research is finding some support for this claim, there are also aspects of rhythm cognition that appear to be species-specific, such as the capability to perceive a regular pulse (or beat) in a varying rhythm. In the current study, using EEG, we adapted an auditory oddball paradigm that allows for disentangling the contributions of beat perception and isochrony to the temporal predictability of the stimulus. We presented two rhesus monkeys (

Indexed as

beat perceptionERPMMNmusicrhythm

Identifiers

PMID30061809
PMCPMC6054994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.