Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061768›Full record

Trial reportMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2018

Evaluating the Efficacy of Nanosil Mouthwash on the Preventing Pulmonary Infection in Intensive Care Unit: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bahareh Khaky, Ahmadreza Yazdannik, Hosein Mahjobipoor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bahareh KhakyStudent Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ahmadreza YazdannikCritical Care Nursing Department, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Hosein MahjobipoorDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral and Oro-pharynx colonization and Micro-aspiration of discharges are two important processes in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). So, this study design to investigated the preventive effect of oral decontamination program by Nanosil mouthwash on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

methods80 newly hospitalized patients who admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) of Amin Medical Education Center were enrolled to a randomized clinical trial study. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In the intervention group, a multi-stage oral decontamination program was performed by using Nanosil mouthwash three times a day, and in the control group oral decontamination was performed by Chlorhexidine 0.12% with same method. The oral decontamination program was continuing for five days. The VAP was diagnosed with a version of modified clinical pulmonary infection scale (MCPIS) on the first and fifth days.

resultsIn compare the case and control groups, there wasn't observed significant difference in age, gender, underling disease, smoking, and primary mean scores of MCPIS, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (P>0.05). In the both groups, the mean scores of SOFA and GCS were significantly improve in fifth day (P<0.05). After five days follow up, the mean score of MCPIS (1.2±0.1 DISCUSSION: The use of oral care program with Nanosil mouthwash is better than Chlorhexidine for the prevention of VAP in patients who admitted in ICU.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMouthMouthwashesPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedReproducibility of ResultsVentilators, MechanicalYoung AdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineMouthwashesIntensive Care UnitMouthwashNanosilVentilator Associated Pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID30061768
PMCPMC6021149
OpenAlexW2807470458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.