ArticleScientific reports2018
A Personalized Arrhythmia Monitoring Platform.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- A Tiny Matched Filter-Based CNN for Inter-Patient ECG Classification and Arrhythmia Detection at the Edge.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Algorithm Classifies Heartbeat Events Based on Electrocardiogram Signals.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- A Vendor-Independent Mobile Health Monitoring Platform for Digital Health Studies: Development and Usability Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmia detection is the core of cardiovascular disease diagnosis. Though, there is no such generic solution for detecting the arrhythmias at the moment they occur which is due to the non-stationary nature and inter-patient variations of ECG signals. The feature extraction and classification techniques are significant tools widely used in the automated classification of arrhythmias. This study aims to develop a personalized arrhythmia monitoring platform allowing real-time detection of arrhythmias from the subject's electrocardiogram (ECG) signal for point-of-care usage. A novel method, i.e. discrete orthogonal stockwell transform (DOST) technique for feature extraction is employed to capture the significant time-frequency coefficients to constitute the feature set representing each of the ECG signals. These coefficients or features are classified using artificial bee colony (ABC) optimized twin least-square support vector machine (LSTSVM) for classifying the different categories of ECG signals. The ABC optimizes the dimension of the feature set and the learning parameters of the classifier. The proposed method is prototyped on the commercially available ARM-based embedded platform and validated on the benchmark MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. Further, the prototype is evaluated under two schemes, i.e. class and personalized schemes which reported a higher overall accuracy of 96.29% and 96.08% in the respective schemes than the existing works to the state-of-art CVDs diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.