Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061555›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Magdalena Szczepanik, Agnieszka Bejer, Sławomir Snela, Daniel Szymczyk, Jarosław Jabłoński, Joanna Majewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena SzczepanikInstitute of Physiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Agnieszka BejerInstitute of Physiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Sławomir SnelaInstitute of Physiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Daniel SzymczykInstitute of Physiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Jarosław JabłońskiOrthopedics and Traumatology Clinic for Adults, Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Joanna MajewskaInstitute of Physiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) is a self-reported questionnaire used for the evaluation of the overall health of patients with knee dysfunctions. The purpose of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of KOS-ADLS and to evaluate its psychometric properties in patients at the end-stage of knee osteoarthritis who were qualified for a total knee replacement (TKR). MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy patients consecutively qualified for surgical TKR procedure participated in this study. To adapt the KOS-ADLS, the following scales and reference tests were used: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Time Up and Go test (TUG), and Five Times Sit to Stand test (5×STS). The studies were conducted 3 times: 2 weeks before surgery (first study), 6 to 13 days later (retest), and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS The Polish version of KOS-ADLS showed excellent reliability (ICC=0.89 SEM=2.68, MDC=7.43) and high responsiveness (ES=4.76, SRM=3.18). The internal consistency was poor in the first assessment (Cronbach's alpha=0.68), but acceptable in the post-surgery evaluation (Cronbach's alpha=0.86). There were fair and moderate correlations found between KOS-ADLS and VAS scales in the first examination, TUG, and 5×STS. Stronger correlations were observed between the results obtained in KOS-ADLS and KOOS. CONCLUSIONS The Polish version of the KOS-ADLS demonstrated good reliability, validity, and responsiveness for use in patients who have undergone TKR surgery.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementPolandPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30061555
PMCPMC6083941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.