Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061469›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Dream experiences and the neural correlates of perceptual consciousness and cognitive access.

Peter Fazekas, Georgina Nemeth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mental causation: an evolutionary perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  2. Hallucinations as intensified forms of mind-wandering.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access: an introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. The methodological puzzle of phenomenal consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter FazekasCentre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium fazekas.peter@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2922-1865
Georgina NemethBehavioural Psychology Programme, Doctoral School of Psychology, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper approaches the debate whether perceptual consciousness requires cognitive access from the perspective of dream studies, and investigates what kind of findings could support the opposing views of this debate. Two kinds of arguments are discussed, one that claims that the hypoactivity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in rapid eye movement sleep is directly relevant, and another that proposes that locating the neural correlates of dream experiences can indirectly inform the debate. It is argued that under closer reflection, neither the classical claim about dorsolateral prefrontal cortex hypoactivity nor the more recent emphasis on general posterior hot zone activity during dreaming stand up to scrutiny. White dreaming is identified as the phenomenon that, nevertheless, holds the most promise to have an impact on the debate. Going beyond the topic if studying dreams can contribute to this debate, it is argued that cognitive access is not a monolithic phenomenon, and its neural correlates are not well understood. There seems to be a relevant form of cognitive access that can operate in the absence of activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and maybe also in the whole frontal region. If so, then exclusive posterior activation during conscious experiences might very well be compatible with the hypothesis that perceptual consciousness requires cognitive access.This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessMental RecallPerceptionDreamsElectroencephalographyHumansPrefrontal CortexSleep, REMcognitive accessdorsolateral prefrontal cortexdreamingposterior hot zonewhite dreams

Identifiers

PMID30061469
PMCPMC6074077
OpenAlexW2883926222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.