Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061465›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Conscious access in the near absence of attention: critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm.

Julian Matthews, Pia Schröder, Lisandro Kaunitz, Jeroen J A van Boxtel, Naotsugu Tsuchiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is episodic-like memoryPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The exclusionary approach to consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Review
  11. Attention: a descriptive taxonomy.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access: an introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. The relationship between attention and consciousness: an expanded taxonomy and implications for 'no-report' paradigms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian MatthewsCognition and Philosophy Lab, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia julian.r.matthews@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1895-3403
Pia SchröderSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Lisandro KaunitzSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Jeroen J A van BoxtelSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2643-0474
Naotsugu TsuchiyaSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia naotsugu.tsuchiya@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-8701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether conscious perception requires attention remains a topic of intense debate. While certain complex stimuli such as faces and animals can be discriminated outside the focus of spatial attention, many simpler stimuli cannot. Because such evidence was obtained in

Indexed as

AttentionConsciousnessMetacognitionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultattentionconfidence ratingsconsciousnessdual taskfacesmetacognition

Identifiers

PMID30061465
PMCPMC6074075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.