Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061462›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

The relationship between attention and consciousness: an expanded taxonomy and implications for 'no-report' paradigms.

Michael A Pitts, Lydia A Lutsyshyna, Steven A Hillyard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The self and conscious experience.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Review
  10. The maps of meaning consciousness theory.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The hidden structure of consciousness.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The exclusionary approach to consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Animal sentience.Philosophy compass · 2022
    Article
  19. Sliding Scale Theory of Attention and Consciousness/Unconsciousness.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael A PittsDepartment of Psychology, Reed College, 3203 SE Woodstock Boulevard, Portland, OR 97202, USA mpitts@reed.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-3443
Lydia A LutsyshynaDepartment of Psychology, Reed College, 3203 SE Woodstock Boulevard, Portland, OR 97202, USA.
Steven A HillyardDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tensions between global neuronal workspace theory and recurrent processing theory have sparked much debate in the field of consciousness research. Here, we focus on one of the key distinctions between these theories: the proposed relationship between attention and consciousness. By reviewing recent empirical evidence, we argue that both theories contain key insights and that certain aspects of each theory can be reconciled into a novel framework that may help guide future research. Alternative theories are also considered, including attended intermediate-level representations theory, integrated information theory and higher order thought theory. With the aim of offering a fresh and nuanced perspective to current theoretical debates, an updated taxonomy of conscious and non-conscious states is proposed. This framework maps a wider spectrum of conscious states by incorporating contemporary views from cognitive neuroscience regarding the variety of attentional mechanisms that are known to interact with sensory processing. Whether certain types of attention are necessary for phenomenal and access consciousness is considered and incorporated into this extended taxonomy. To navigate this expanded space, we review recent 'no-report' paradigms and address several methodological misunderstandings in order to pave a clear path forward for identifying the neural basis of perceptual awareness.This article is part of the theme issue 'Perceptual consciousness and cognitive access'.

Indexed as

AttentionAwarenessCognitionConsciousnessHumansaccess consciousnessglobal neuronal workspace theoryno-report paradigmsperceptual awarenessphenomenal consciousnessrecurrent processing theory

Identifiers

PMID30061462
PMCPMC6074089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.