ArticleBMJ open2018
Protocol for a phase II, monocentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to assess efficacy of pyridostigmine in patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2-4 (SPACE trial).
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Mono-center, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Crossover Trial to Investigate Effect and Efficacy of Pyridostigmine in Dutch Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Types 2, 3 and 4
Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amifampridine safety and efficacy in spinal muscular atrophy ambulatory patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover phase 2 trial.Journal of neurology · 2022Trial
- Motor Unit Patterns Correlate With Severity in Symptomatic Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Current Medications and Re-purposed Drugs.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Fatigue in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: a fundamental open issue.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2024Review
- Assessing the Assisted Six-Minute Cycling Test as a Measure of Endurance in Non-Ambulatory Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A multilevel screening pipeline in zebrafish identifies therapeutic drugs for GAN.EMBO molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Translating fatigability in spinal muscular atrophy to clinical trials and management.Muscle & nerve · 2023Article
- New therapies for spinal muscular atrophy: where we stand and what is next.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Measuring Fatigue and Fatigability in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The RESISTANT study (Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial with pyridostigmine in spinal muscular atrophy types 2-4.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Pharmacotherapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Babies and Children: A Review of Approved and Experimental Therapies.Paediatric drugs · 2022Review
- Review
- Magnetic resonance reveals mitochondrial dysfunction and muscle remodelling in spinal muscular atrophy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Recent research on the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Review
- [Spinal muscular atrophy].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Article
- Spinal muscular atrophy: From approved therapies to future therapeutic targets for personalized medicine.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Review
- Persistent neuromuscular junction transmission defects in adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with nusinersen.BMJ neurology open · 2021Article
- The Antisense Oligonucleotide Nusinersen for Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Orthopedic reviews · 2021Review
- Spinal muscular atrophy - insights and challenges in the treatment era.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHereditary proximal spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by homozygous loss of function of the survival motor neuron 1 gene. The main characteristic of SMA is degeneration of alpha motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord, but recent studies in animal models and patients have shown additional anatomical abnormalities and dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). NMJ dysfunction could contribute to symptoms of weakness and fatigability in patients with SMA. We hypothesise that pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that improves neuromuscular transmission, could improve NMJ function and thereby muscle strength and fatigability in patients with SMA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a monocentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over trial with pyridostigmine and placebo to investigate the effect and efficacy of pyridostigmine on muscle strength and fatigability in patients with genetically confirmed SMA. We aim to include 45 patients with SMA types 2-4, aged 12 years and older in the Netherlands. Participants receive 8 weeks of treatment with pyridostigmine and 8 weeks of treatment with placebo in a random order separated by a washout period of 1 week. Treatment allocation is double blinded. Treatment dose will gradually be increased from 2 mg/kg/day to the maximum dose of 6 mg/kg/day in four daily doses, in the first week of each treatment period. The primary outcome measures are a change in the Motor Function Measure and repeated nine-hole peg test before and after treatment. Secondary outcome measures are changes in recently developed endurance tests, that is, the endurance shuttle nine-hole peg test, the endurance shuttle box and block test and the endurance shuttle walk test, muscle strength, level of daily functioning, quality of and activity in life, perceived fatigue and fatigability, presence of decrement on repetitive nerve stimulation and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the local medical ethical review committee at the University Medical Center Utrecht and by the national Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. Findings will be shared with the academic and medical community, funding and patient organisations in order to contribute to optimisation of medical care and quality of life for patients with SMA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02941328.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.