ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018
Quantitative measurements of protein-surface interaction thermodynamics.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoclay-Doped Electrospun Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering: Investigation on the Structural Modifications in Physiological Environment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Article
- The effect of charged residue substitutions on the thermodynamics of protein-surface interactions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Elucidating the Mechanisms Underlying the Signal Drift of Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensors in Whole Blood.ACS sensors · 2021Article
- Open Source Software for the Real-Time Control, Processing, and Visualization of High-Volume Electrochemical Data.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Surface Attachment Enhances the Thermodynamic Stability of Protein L.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whereas proteins generally remain stable upon interaction with biological surfaces, they frequently unfold on and adhere to artificial surfaces. Understanding the physicochemical origins of this discrepancy would facilitate development of protein-based sensors and other technologies that require surfaces that do not compromise protein structure and function. To date, however, only a small number of such artificial surfaces have been reported, and the physics of why these surfaces support functional biomolecules while others do not has not been established. Thus motivated, we have developed an electrochemical approach to determining the folding free energy of proteins site-specifically attached to chemically well-defined, macroscopic surfaces. Comparison with the folding free energies seen in bulk solution then provides a quantitative measure of the extent to which surface interactions alter protein stability. As proof-of-principle, we have characterized the FynSH3 domain site-specifically attached to a hydroxyl-coated surface. Upon guanidinium chloride denaturation, the protein unfolds in a reversible, two-state manner with a free energy within 2 kJ/mol of the value seen in bulk solution. Assuming that excluded volume effects stabilize surface-attached proteins, this observation suggests there are countervening destabilizing interactions with the surface that, under these conditions, are similar in magnitude. Our technique constitutes an unprecedented experimental tool with which to answer long-standing questions regarding the molecular-scale origins of protein-surface interactions and to facilitate rational optimization of surface biocompatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.