Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061371›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2018

Whole-genome sequencing analysis of CNV using low-coverage and paired-end strategies is efficient and outperforms array-based CNV analysis.

Bo Zhou, Steve S Ho, Xianglong Zhang, Reenal Pattni, Rajini R Haraksingh, Alexander E Urban

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. <italic>WT1</italic> Deletion in 46,XY DSD: The Importance of Copy Number Variant Analysis.Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biomedicines · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Resolving the 22q11.2 deletion using CTLR-Seq reveals chromosomal rearrangement mechanisms and individual variance in breakpoints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo ZhouDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6533-7462
Steve S HoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Xianglong ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Reenal PattniDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Rajini R HaraksinghDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Saint Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Alexander E UrbanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USUniversity of the West Indies · TT

Funding

Special EquipmentP50HG007735 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD Y · 2014 to 2018
$15.2M
Multi-Institutional Training in Genetic/Genomic Approaches to Sleep DisordersT32HL110952 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHERVIN, RONALD D, MIGNOT, EMMANUEL J · 2013 to 2022
$5.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG007735NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variation (CNV) analysis is an integral component of the study of human genomes in both research and clinical settings. Array-based CNV analysis is the current first-tier approach in clinical cytogenetics. Decreasing costs in high-throughput sequencing and cloud computing have opened doors for the development of sequencing-based CNV analysis pipelines with fast turnaround times. We carry out a systematic and quantitative comparative analysis for several low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (WGS) strategies to detect CNV in the human genome.

methodsWe compared the CNV detection capabilities of WGS strategies (short insert, 3 kb insert mate pair and 5 kb insert mate pair) each at 1×, 3× and 5× coverages relative to each other and to 17 currently used high-density oligonucleotide arrays. For benchmarking, we used a set of gold standard (GS) CNVs generated for the 1000 Genomes Project CEU subject NA12878.

resultsOverall, low-coverage WGS strategies detect drastically more GS CNVs compared with arrays and are accompanied with smaller percentages of CNV calls without validation. Furthermore, we show that WGS (at ≥1× coverage) is able to detect all seven GS deletion CNVs >100 kb in NA12878, whereas only one is detected by most arrays. Lastly, we show that the much larger 15 Mbp Cri du chat deletion can be readily detected with short-insert paired-end WGS at even just 1× coverage.

conclusionsCNV analysis using low-coverage WGS is efficient and outperforms the array-based analysis that is currently used for clinical cytogenetics.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanGenomicsWhole Genome SequencingGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityarray Cgh (acgh)copy-number variation (cnv)discordant read-pair analysismate-pair sequencingread-depth analysis

Identifiers

PMID30061371
PMCPMC8131063
OpenAlexW2885874790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.