Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30061295›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Sílvia M Illamola, Hoa Q Huynh, Xiaoxi Liu, Zubin N Bhakta, Catherine M Sherwin, Theodore G Liou, Holly Carveth, David C Young

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. SCOUT: An Exploratory Approach to Scouting Dose-Relevant Covariates.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sílvia M IllamolaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Hoa Q HuynhUniversity of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Xiaoxi LiuDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Zubin N BhaktaThe Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Catherine M SherwinDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Theodore G LiouThe Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0121-4847
Holly CarvethThe Adult Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
David C YoungUniversity of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA david.young@hsc.utah.edu.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Explanatory models of CF Survival, Infection and Intermediate Clinical OutcomesR01HL125520 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LIOU, THEODORE GEH-LU · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practitioners commonly use amikacin in patients with cystic fibrosis. Establishment of the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in adults with cystic fibrosis may increase the efficacy and safety of therapy. This study was aimed to establish the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in adults with cystic fibrosis. We used serum concentration data obtained during routine therapeutic drug monitoring and explored the influence of patient covariates on drug disposition. We performed a retrospective chart review to collect the amikacin dosing regimens, serum amikacin concentrations, blood sampling times, and patient characteristics for adults with cystic fibrosis admitted for treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations. Amikacin concentrations were retrospectively collected for 49 adults with cystic fibrosis, and 192 serum concentrations were available for analysis. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with the first-order conditional estimation method. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination best described amikacin pharmacokinetics. Creatinine clearance and weight were identified as significant covariates for clearance and the volume of distribution, respectively, in the final model. Residual variability was modeled using a proportional error model. Typical estimates for clearance, central and peripheral volumes of distribution, and intercompartmental clearance were 3.06 liters/h, 14.4 liters, 17.1 liters, and 0.925 liters/h, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of amikacin in individuals with cystic fibrosis seems to differ from those in individuals without cystic fibrosis. However, further investigations are needed to confirm these results and, thus, the need for variations in amikacin dosing. Future pharmacodynamic studies will potentially establish the optimal amikacin dosing regimens for the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations in adult patients with CF.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmikacinAminoglycosidesCreatinineCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAmikacinAminoglycosidesCreatinineamikacinaminoglycosidescystic fibrosispopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID30061295
PMCPMC6153835
OpenAlexW2885573240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.