ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2019
Long-Term Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care at Regionalized Centers.
Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07002294 (The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of SPecialty cAre on Recovery From Cardiac Arrest Trial (the SPARC Trial)
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 2. Current status of cardiac arrest and the chain of survival.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- Part 4: Systems of Care: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Guideline
- Impact of Cardiac Arrest Centers on the Survival of Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Pooled it
- 2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 2. Environment for cardiac arrest survival and the chain of survival.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2021Guideline
- 2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 5. Post-cardiac arrest care.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2021Guideline
- Design and rationale of the SPARC trial: a phase II, single-system randomized controlled trial of immediate transfer to specialty post-arrest care.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- The Time Is Ripe for Cardiac Arrest Centers and Regionalized Cardiac Arrest Networks: Insights From the Cardiac Arrest Survival Score.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Centers With and Without On-Site Coronary Angiography: A Nationwide Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- International Consensus on Evidence Gaps and Research Opportunities in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Implementing an Educational Model for Cardiac Arrest Patients During Interfacility Transfers.Cureus · 2025Article
- Management of Patients With Cardiac Arrest Requiring Interfacility Transport: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes' determinants: an Italian retrospective cohort study based on Lombardia CARe.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Assessing variations in care delivered to rural out of hospital cardiac arrest patients in the interfacility transfer setting.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- Standardizing post-cardiac arrest care across rural-urban settings - qualitative findings on proposed post-cardiac arrest learning community intervention.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Comparing strategies for prehospital transport to specialty care after cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2023Article
- Self-fulfilling prophecies and machine learning in resuscitation science.Resuscitation · 2023Review
- Evaluating novel methods of outcome assessment following cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2022Article
- Survival Rates After Pediatric Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Suggest an Underappreciated Therapeutic Opportunity.Pediatric emergency care · 2022Observational
- Long-term outcomes of post-cardiac arrest patients with severe neurological and functional impairments at hospital discharge.Resuscitation · 2022Article
- Physicians' cognitive approach to prognostication after cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveIt is unknown whether regionalization of postarrest care by interfacility transfer to cardiac arrest receiving centers reduces mortality. We seek to evaluate whether treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center, whether by direct transport or early interfacility transfer, is independently associated with long-term outcome.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study including adults resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in southwestern Pennsylvania and neighboring Ohio, West Virginia, and Maryland, which includes approximately 5.7 million residents in urban, suburban, and rural counties. Patients were treated by 1 of 78 ground emergency medical services agencies or 2 air medical transport agencies between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2014. Our primary exposures of interest were interfacility transfer to a cardiac arrest receiving center within 24 hours of arrest or any treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center regardless of transfer status. Our primary outcome was vital status, assessed through December 31, 2014, with National Death Index records. We used unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses to test the independent association of cardiac arrest receiving center care, whether through direct or interfacility transport, on mortality.
resultsOverall, 5,217 cases were observed for 3,629 person-years, with 3,865 total deaths. Most patients (82%) were treated at 42 non-cardiac arrest receiving centers with median annual volume of 17 cases (interquartile range 1 to 53 cases per center annually), whereas 18% were cared for at cardiac arrest receiving centers receiving at least 1 interfacility transfer per month. In adjusted models, treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center was independently associated with reduced hazard of death compared with treatment at a non-cardiac arrest receiving center (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.94). These effects were unchanged when analysis was restricted to patients brought from the scene to the treating hospital. No other hospital characteristic, including total out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient volume and cardiac catheterization capabilities, independently predicted outcome.
conclusionBoth early interfacility transfer to a cardiac arrest receiving center and direct transport to a cardiac arrest receiving center from the scene are independently associated with reduced mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.