Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30060734›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

The capacity to work puzzle: a qualitative study of physicians' assessments for patients with common mental disorders.

Monica Bertilsson, Silje Maeland, Jesper Löve, Gunnar Ahlborg, Erik L Werner, Gunnel Hensing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica BertilssonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine/Epidemiology and Social Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 453, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. monica.bertilsson@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-2522
Silje MaelandUni Research Health, Uni Research, Bergen, Norway.
Jesper LöveDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine/Epidemiology and Social Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 453, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Gunnar AhlborgInstitute of Medicine/Occupational and Environmental Health, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erik L WernerUni Research Health, Uni Research, Bergen, Norway.
Gunnel HensingDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine/Epidemiology and Social Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 453, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SERegion Västra Götaland · SEUni Research (Norway) · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEntitlement to sickness benefits is a legal process requiring health-related reduced work capacity confirmed by a physician via a sickness certificate. However, there is a knowledge gap concerning physicians' clinical practice of work capacity assessments for patients with common mental disorders (CMD). Physicians claim more knowledge and skills in how to actually do the assessments. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' tacit knowledge of performing assessments of capacity to work and the need for sickness absence in patients with depression and anxiety disorders.

methodsWe performed a qualitative study with open-ended interviews and a short video vignette of a physician and a patient with depression as stimuli. Participating physicians (n = 24) were specialized in general practice, occupational health or psychiatry and experienced in treating patients with depression and anxiety. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive content analysis was used as the analytical tool.

resultsFive categories were identified. Category 1 identified work capacity assessment as doing a jigsaw puzzle without any master model. The physicians both identified and created the pieces of the puzzle, mainly by facilitating strategies to make the patient a better supplier of essential information. The finished puzzle made up a highly individualized comprehensive picture required for adequate assessment. Categories 2-4 identified the particular essential pieces of information the participants used, relating to the patient's disorder, capacity in the work place and contextual everyday life. For the sickness absence assessment, apart from decreased work capacity, the physicians also took particulars of the work place into account; e.g. could the work place handle an employee with reduced capacity.

conclusionsPhysicians' tacit knowledge of assessing work capacity and the need for sickness absence for patients with CMD was identified as doing a jigsaw puzzle. The physicians became identifiers and creators of the pieces of the puzzle using a broad palette of essential information. Our findings contribute to the knowledge gap on clinical assessment and can be used as an educational tool. Because they are based on the professions' tacit knowledge, acceptance of the model can be expected to be high.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderGeneral PractitionersOccupational MedicinePsychiatryWork Capacity EvaluationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSick LeaveCommon mental disorderSickness absenceWork capacity assessment

Identifiers

PMID30060734
PMCPMC6066915
OpenAlexW2887340773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.