ArticleBMC genomics2018
Correction to: Detect tissue heterogeneity in gene expression data with BioQC.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying transcriptome diversity: a review.Briefings in functional genomics · 2024Review
- Genome-wide copy number variation detection in a large cohort of diverse horse breeds by whole-genome sequencing.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After the publication of this work [1], a mistake was noticed in the Eq. 1. Given an m × n expression matrix with m genes and samples of n tissues, the correct definition of the Gini index for gene i is.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.