ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018
A surrogate assay for measuring Coxsackievirus A6 neutralizing antibodies.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploring the Use of Viral Vectors Pseudotyped with Viral Glycoproteins as Tools to Study Antibody-Mediated Neutralizing Activity.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
- Pseudotyped Viruses for Enterovirus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Development of a pseudovirus-based assay for measuring neutralizing antibodies against Coxsackievirus A10.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coxsackievirus A6 (CV-A6) is one of pathogens causing hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) and becomes a new challenge to HFMD control. In this study, we first built a single-round pseudovirus infection system for CV-A6, and then developed a pseudovirus luciferase assay (PVLA) for anti-CV-A6 neutralizing antibody (NtAb) quantification. Since cytopahtic effect (CPE) is considered as the gold standard test for anti-enterovirus NtAb detection, a comparison study has been performed using 318 clinical serum samples, as measured both by PVLA and CPE. The sensitivity and specificity of PVLA was 94.9% (95% CI between 90.8-97.5%) and 92.7% (95% CI between 86.6-96.6%), respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that PVLA and CPE were highly correlated (spearman r = 0.931, P < 0.0001) and in good agreement (94.0%, 95% CI between 90.8-96.4%), showing that PVLA could be used as a surrogate assay for anti-CV-A6 NtAb detection and served as a valuable tool for CV-A6 vaccine evaluation and CV-A6 epidemiological surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.