ReviewMembranes2018
Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO₂ Separation: A Review.
Review in Membranes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and Supramolecular Pathways for COChemSusChem · 2026Review
- Controlling the Hierarchical Morphology of ZIF-67 via Hydrothermal Synthesis: Insights into the Stability for Gas Separation.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
- Review
- Modelling Gas Transport in Multiphasic Materials: Application to Semicrystalline Membranes.Membranes · 2025Article
- Biopolymer-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs) for COMembranes · 2022Article
- Mixed Matrix Membranes Loaded with a Porous Organic Polymer Having Bipyridine Moieties.Membranes · 2022Article
- Hybrid organic-inorganic membranes based on sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) matrix and iron-encapsulated carbon nanotubes and their application in CORSC advances · 2022Article
- Development of Amine-Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks Hollow Fiber Mixed Matrix Membranes for COPolymers · 2022Review
- Characteristics of Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Membranes Containing Carbon Nanotubes with Increased Iron-Encapsulated Content for COMembranes · 2022Article
- Highly Permeable Mixed Matrix Hollow Fiber Membrane as a Latent Route for Hydrogen Purification from Hydrocarbons/Carbon Dioxide.Membranes · 2021Article
- COMembranes · 2021Article
- Article
- Metal and Covalent Organic Frameworks for Membrane Applications.Membranes · 2020Review
- Mixed Matrix Membranes.Membranes · 2019Article
- Review
- Poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne)-Based Hybrid Membranes: Effects of Various Nanofillers and Feed Gas Humidity on CO₂ Permeation.Membranes · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of conventional polymeric membranes in CO₂ separation processes are limited by the existing trade-off between permeability and selectivity represented by the renowned upper bound. Addition of porous nanofillers in polymeric membranes is a promising approach to transcend the upper bound, owing to their superior separation capabilities. Porous nanofillers entice increased attention over nonporous counterparts due to their inherent CO₂ uptake capacities and secondary transport pathways when added to polymer matrices. Infinite possibilities of tuning the porous architecture of these nanofillers also facilitate simultaneous enhancement of permeability, selectivity and stability features of the membrane conveniently heading in the direction towards industrial realization. This review focuses on presenting a complete synopsis of inherent capacities of several porous nanofillers, like metal organic frameworks (MOFs), Zeolites, and porous organic frameworks (POFs) and the effects on their addition to polymeric membranes. Gas permeation performances of select hybrids with these three-dimensional (3D) fillers and porous nanosheets have been summarized and discussed with respect to each type. Consequently, the benefits and shortcomings of each class of materials have been outlined and future research directions concerning the hybrids with 3D fillers have been suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.