Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30060509›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Quantitative Analysis of Seven New Prostate Cancer Biomarkers and the Potential Future of the 'Biomarker Laboratory'.

Kevin Cao, Callum Arthurs, Ali Atta-Ul, Michael Millar, Mariana Beltran, Jochen Neuhaus, Lars-Christian Horn, Rui Henrique, Aamir Ahmed, Christopher Thrasivoulou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kevin CaoProstate Cancer Research Centre at the Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK. kevincaowork@gmail.com.
Callum ArthursProstate Cancer Research Centre at the Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK. callumarthurs@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8508-3754
Ali Atta-UlProstate Cancer Research Centre, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. aliattaul@outlook.com.
Michael MillarQueen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK. mike.millar@ed.ac.uk.
Mariana BeltranAquila BioMedical, Nine, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK. mariana.beltran@aquila-bm.com.
Jochen NeuhausHead of Urology Research Laboratories, University of Leipzig, Department of Urology, Research Laboratory, Liebigstr. 19, Building C, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. jochen.neuhaus@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-6994
Lars-Christian HornDivision of Gynecologic, Breast & Perinatal Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstasse 24 D, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Lars-Christain.Horn@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Rui HenriqueDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal. rmhenrique@icbas.up.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-3171-4666
Aamir AhmedProstate Cancer Research Centre at the Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK. aamir.ahmed@kcl.ac.uk.
Christopher ThrasivoulouResearch Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, The Centre for Cell and Molecular Dynamics, Rockefeller Building, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. c.thrasivoulou@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9425-8624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the third highest cause of male mortality in the developed world, with the burden of the disease increasing dramatically with demographic change. There are significant limitations to the current diagnostic regimens and no established effective screening modality. To this end, research has discovered hundreds of potential 'biomarkers' that may one day be of use in screening, diagnosis or prognostication. However, the barriers to bringing biomarkers to clinical evaluation and eventually into clinical usage have yet to be realised. This is an operational challenge that requires some new thinking and development of paradigms to increase the efficiency of the laboratory process and add 'value' to the clinician. Value comes in various forms, whether it be a process that is seamlessly integrated into the hospital laboratory environment or one that can provide additional 'information' for the clinical pathologist in terms of risk profiling. We describe, herein, an efficient and tissue-conserving pipeline that uses Tissue Microarrays in a semi-automated process that could, one day, be integrated into the hospital laboratory domain, using seven putative prostate cancer biomarkers for illustration.

Indexed as

automated workflowbiomarker discoveryclinical managementmorphology-guided analysistissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID30060509
PMCPMC6163663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.