Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30060152›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Control Engagement During Sentence and Inhibition fMRI Tasks in Children With Reading Difficulties.

Mary Abbe Roe, Joel E Martinez, Jeanette A Mumford, W Patrick Taylor, Paul T Cirino, Jack M Fletcher, Jenifer Juranek, Jessica A Church

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain connectivity and academic skills in English learners.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  8. The behavioral and neurobiological relationships between executive function and reading: A review and preliminary findings.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  9. The Brain's Control Networks in Reading: Insights From Cross-Task Studies of Youth.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Understanding the interplay between executive functions and reading development: A challenge for researchers and practitioners alike.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Brain Engagement During a Cognitive Flexibility Task Relates to Academic Performance in English Learners.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Brain activity in struggling readers before intervention relates to future reading gains.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mary Abbe RoeDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Joel E MartinezDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jeanette A MumfordCenter for Healthy Minds, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
W Patrick TaylorDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, TX, USA.
Paul T CirinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, TX, USA.
Jack M FletcherDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, TX, USA.
Jenifer JuranekDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Jessica A ChurchDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Texas Center for Learning DisabilitiesP50HD052117 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FLETCHER, JACK M · 2006 to 2023
$26.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reading research implicates executive control regions as sites of difference in struggling readers. However, as studies often employ only reading or language tasks, the extent of deviation in control engagement in children with reading difficulties is not known. The current study investigated activation in reading and executive control brain regions during both a sentence comprehension task and a nonlexical inhibitory control task in third-fifth grade children with and without reading difficulties. We employed both categorical (group-based) and individual difference approaches to relate reading ability to brain activity. During sentence comprehension, struggling readers had less activation in the left posterior temporal cortex, previously implicated in language, semantic, and reading research. Greater negative activity (relative to fixation) during sentence comprehension in a left inferior parietal region from the executive control literature correlated with poorer reading ability. Greater comprehension scores were associated with less dorsal anterior cingulate activity during the sentence comprehension task. Unlike the sentence task, there were no significant differences between struggling and nonstruggling readers for the nonlexical inhibitory control task. Thus, differences in executive control engagement were largely specific to reading, rather than a general control deficit across tasks in children with reading difficulties, informing future intervention research.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexChildComprehensionDyslexiaExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPsychomotor PerformanceReading

Identifiers

PMID30060152
PMCPMC6132278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.