ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Quantifying heterogeneity of expression data based on principal components.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dimension-wise sparse low-rank approximation of a matrix with application to variable selection in high-dimensional integrative analyzes of association.Journal of applied statistics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe diversity of biological omics data provides richness of information, but also presents an analytic challenge. While there has been much methodological and theoretical development on the statistical handling of large volumes of biological data, far less attention has been devoted to characterizing their veracity and variability.
resultsWe propose a method of statistically quantifying heterogeneity among multiple groups of datasets, derived from different omics modalities over various experimental and/or disease conditions. It draws upon strategies from analysis of variance and principal component analysis in order to reduce dimensionality of the variability across multiple data groups. The resulting hypothesis-based inference procedure is demonstrated with synthetic and real data from a cell line study of growth factor responsiveness based on a factorial experimental design. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and datasets are freely available at https://github.com/yangzi4/gPCA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.