Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30060064›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2018

Investigating the relationship between fetal growth and academic attainment: secondary analysis of the Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort.

Tom Norris, William Johnson, Emily Petherick, Noel Cameron, Sam Oddie, Samantha Johnson, John Wright, Elizabeth Draper, Philip N Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tom NorrisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
William JohnsonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Emily PetherickSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Noel CameronSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Sam OddieBradford Neonatology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Samantha JohnsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
John WrightBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Elizabeth DraperDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Philip N BakerCollege of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17210Medical Research Council MR/N024397/1Medical Research Council MR/P023347/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT101597MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The relationship between ultrasongraphically derived estimates of fetal growth and educational attainment in the postnatal period is unknown. Results from previous studies focusing on cognitive ability, however, suggest there may be gestation-specific associations. Our objective was to model growth in fetal weight (EFW) and head circumference (HC) and identify whether growth variation in different periods was related to academic attainment in middle childhood. Methods: Data come from the Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort study, which has performed data linkage to both routine antenatal scans and national academic attainment tests at age 6-7 years. Multilevel linear spline models were used to model EFW and HC. Random effects from these were related to Key Stage 1 (KS1) results in reading, writing, mathematics, science and a composite of all four (age 6-7 years), using ordinal logistic and logistic regression. Associations were adjusted for potential confounders, facilitated by directed acyclic graphs. Missing covariate data were imputed using multiple imputation. Results: In all, 6995 and 8438 children had complete KS1, and EFW and HC data, respectively. Positive associations were observed between both fetal weight in early pregnancy (14 weeks) and EFW growth in mid-pregnancy (14-26 weeks) and the individual KS1 outcomes. Furthermore, after adjustment for previous size and confounders, a 1-z score increase in growth in mid-pregnancy was associated with an 8% increased odds of achieving the expected standard for all KS1 outcomes [odds ratio (OR): 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02; 1.13]. Similar results were observed for HC, with generally larger effect sizes. Smaller associations were observed with growth in the early-third trimester, with no associations observed with growth in the later-third trimester. Conclusions: We observed consistent positive associations between fetal size and growth in early and mid-gestation and academic attainment in childhood. The smaller and null associations with growth in the early-third and later-third trimester, respectively, suggests that early-mid gestation may be a sensitive period for future cognitive development.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessBirth WeightChildFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdUltrasonography, PrenatalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30060064
PMCPMC6208280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.