Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30059897›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2018

Negotiating space & drug use in emergency shelters with peer witness injection programs within the context of an overdose crisis: A qualitative study.

Geoff Bardwell, Jade Boyd, Thomas Kerr, Ryan McNeil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Using illicit drugs alone in Vancouver, Canada: a gender-based analysis.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geoff BardwellBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9. Electronic address: gbardwell@cfenet.ubc.ca.
Jade BoydBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9. Electronic address: jade.boyd@bccsu.ubc.ca.
Thomas KerrBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9. Electronic address: bccsu-tk@cfenet.ubc.ca.
Ryan McNeilBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 2A9. Electronic address: ryan.mcneil@bccsu.ubc.ca.
St. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

An ethno-epidemiological study of the implementation and effectiveness of an innovative and comprehensive response to the opioid epidemicR01DA044181 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI Thomas Kerr, Ryan McNeil · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
CIHR 20R74326NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancouver, Canada is experiencing an overdose crisis due to the proliferation of fentanyl and related analogues and novel overdose response interventions are being implemented across multiple high overdose risk environments, including emergency shelters. We draw on ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews to examine how social, structural, and physical contexts at two emergency shelters implementing a peer-based supervised injection intervention influenced injection drug use and overdose risks. Findings reveal that the implementation of this intervention reduced stigma and shame through the normalization of drug use in shelter spaces, and yet underlying social norms and material constraints led people to inject alone in non-designated injecting spaces. Whereas these spatial dynamics of injection drug use potentially increased overdose vulnerability, an emerging sense of collective responsibility in relation to the overdose crisis led to the routinization of peer witnessing practices across the shelter environment to extend the impact of the intervention.

Indexed as

NegotiatingPeer GroupSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdultAnthropology, CulturalBritish ColumbiaDrug OverdoseDrug UsersEmergency ShelterFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRisk Reduction Behavior

Identifiers

PMID30059897
PMCPMC6150825
OpenAlexW2884960082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.