Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30059827›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2018

Integrating genetic and protein-protein interaction networks maps a functional wiring diagram of a cell.

Benjamin VanderSluis, Michael Costanzo, Maximilian Billmann, Henry N Ward, Chad L Myers, Brenda J Andrews, Charles Boone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Multipronged Unbiased Strategy Guides the Development of an Anti-EGFR/EPHA2-Bispecific Antibody for Combination Cancer Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetic interaction networks in cancer cells.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin VanderSluisDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 200 Union Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Michael CostanzoThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
Maximilian BillmannDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 200 Union Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Henry N WardDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 200 Union Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Chad L MyersDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 200 Union Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: chadm@umn.edu.
Brenda J AndrewsThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada. Electronic address: brenda.andrews@utoronto.ca.
Charles BooneThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada; RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Mapping the reference genetic network of a eukaryotic cellR01HG005853 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI ANDREWS, BRENDA JEAN, BOONE, CHARLES · 2010 to 2025
$7.6M
Methods for large-scale analysis of chemical-genetic interactionsR01HG005084 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MYERS, CHAD L · 2010 to 2022
$2.9M
CIHR FDN-143264CIHR FDN-143265NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005084NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic experimental approaches have led to construction of comprehensive genetic and protein-protein interaction networks for the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetic interactions capture functional relationships between genes using phenotypic readouts, while protein-protein interactions identify physical connections between gene products. These complementary, and largely non-overlapping, networks provide a global view of the functional architecture of a cell, revealing general organizing principles, many of which appear to be evolutionarily conserved. Here, we focus on insights derived from the integration of large-scale genetic and protein-protein interaction networks, highlighting principles that apply to both unicellular and more complex systems, including human cells. Network integration reveals fundamental connections involving key functional modules of eukaryotic cells, defining a core network of cellular function, which could be elaborated to explore cell-type specificity in metazoans.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Interaction MapsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30059827
PMCPMC6295359
OpenAlexW2884524189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.