Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30059525›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Drivers of reef shark abundance and biomass in the Solomon Islands.

Jordan S Goetze, Tim J Langlois, Joe McCarter, Colin A Simpfendorfer, Alec Hughes, Jacob Tingo Leve, Stacy D Jupiter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Defining ecological roles of sharks on coral reefs.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jordan S GoetzeDepartment of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-9763
Tim J LangloisThe UWA Oceans Institute and School of Biological Sciences (M470), Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Joe McCarterCenter for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History, New York, United States of America.
Colin A SimpfendorferCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries & Aquaculture, and College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Alec HughesWildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Regional Program, Suva, Fiji.
Jacob Tingo LeveWildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Regional Program, Suva, Fiji.
Stacy D JupiterWildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Regional Program, Suva, Fiji.
Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji · FJAmerican Museum of Natural History · USJames Cook University · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUWildlife Conservation Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote island nations face a number of challenges in addressing concerns about shark population status, including access to rigorously collected data and resources to manage fisheries. At present, very little data are available on shark populations in the Solomon Islands and scientific surveys to document shark and ray diversity and distribution have not been completed. We aimed to provide a baseline of the relative abundance and diversity of reef sharks and rays and assess the major drivers of reef shark abundance/biomass in the Western Province of the Solomon Islands using stereo baited remote underwater video. On average reef sharks were more abundant than in surrounding countries such as Fiji and Indonesia, yet below that of remote islands without historical fishing pressure, suggesting populations are relatively healthy but not pristine. We also assessed the influence of location, habitat type/complexity, depth and prey biomass on reef shark abundance and biomass. Location was the most important factor driving reef shark abundance and biomass with two times the abundance and a 43% greater biomass of reef sharks in the more remote locations, suggesting fishing may be impacting sharks in some areas. Our results give a much needed baseline and suggest that reef shark populations are still relatively unexploited, providing an opportunity for improved management of sharks and rays in the Solomon Islands.

Indexed as

BiomassCoral ReefsSharksAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesMelanesiaPopulation DensitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30059525
PMCPMC6066198
OpenAlexW2885250084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.