Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30059034›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2018

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics - Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities.

Johannes Lambrecht, Florian Schattenberg, Hauke Harms, Susann Mueller

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cybergenetic control of microbial community composition.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-Term Behavior of Defined Mixed Cultures ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  8. Genes & nutrition · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes LambrechtDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ.
Florian SchattenbergDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ.
Hauke HarmsDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ.
Susann MuellerDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ; susann.mueller@ufz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of pure cultures and monitoring of microbial community dynamics is vital to understand and control natural ecosystems and technical applications driven by microorganisms. Next generation sequencing methods are widely utilized to resolve microbiomes, but they are generally resource and time intensive and deliver mostly qualitative information. Flow cytometric microbiome analysis does not suffer from those disadvantages and can provide relative subcommunity abundances and absolute cell numbers at-line. Although it does not deliver direct phylogenetic information, it can enhance the analysis depth and resolution of sequencing approaches. In sharp contrast to medical applications in both research and routine settings, flow cytometry is still not widely used for microbiome analysis. Missing information on sample preparation and data analysis pipelines may create an entry barrier for the researchers facing microbiome analysis challenges that would often be textbook flow cytometry applications. Here, we present three comprehensive workflows for pure cultures, complex communities in clear medium and complex communities in challenging matrices, respectively. We describe individual sampling and fixation procedures and optimized staining protocols for the respective sample sets. We elaborate the cytometric analysis with a complex research centered and an application focused bench top device, describe the cell sorting procedure and suggest data analysis packages. We furthermore propose important experimental controls and apply the presented workflows to the respective sample sets.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID30059034
PMCPMC6126456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.