Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30058984›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

Effects of the 2009 USPSTF Depression Screening Recommendation on Diagnosing and Treating Mental Health Conditions in Older Adults: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

Taeho Greg Rhee, Benjamin D Capistrant, Jon C Schommer, Ronald S Hadsall, Donald L Uden

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PERSPECTIVE: A Path to Value-Based Insurance Design for Mental Health Services.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2024
    Article
  3. Coprescribing of Benzodiazepines and Opioids in Older Adults: Rates, Correlates, and National Trends.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taeho Greg Rhee1 Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; and Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Benjamin D Capistrant2 School of Social Work, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts.
Jon C Schommer3 Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Ronald S Hadsall3 Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Donald L Uden3 Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
University of Minnesota · USSmith College · US

Funding

Yale Training Program in Geriatric Clinical Epidemiology and Aging-Related ResearchT32AG019134 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Terri R. Fried · 2001 to 2026
$7.5M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG019134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a common mental condition in U.S. older adults. To improve rates of underdiagnosis and undertreatment for depression and other mental health conditions in primary care settings, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) updates and disseminates its depression screening guideline regularly.

objectiveTo examine the effects of the 2009 USPSTF depression screening recommendation on the 3 following outcomes: diagnoses of mental health conditions, antidepressant prescriptions (overall and potentially inappropriate), and provision of nonpharmacological psychiatric services in office-based outpatient primary care visits made by adults aged 65 or older.

methodsData from the 2006-2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a nationally representative sample of office-based outpatient primary care visits among older adults (n = 15,596 unweighted), were used. NAMCS represents physician practicing patterns of ambulatory medical care services utilization at the national level. Using a series of multivariate difference-in-differences analyses, we estimated effects of the USPSTF depression screening recommendation on the previously mentioned outcomes by comparing pre- (2006-2009) and post- (2010-2012) periods to describe primary care physician practice patterns.

resultsDifferences in any mental health diagnosis by the depression screening status were -34.7% in the pre-2009 period and -20.2% in the post-2009 period, resulting in a differential effect of -14.4% (95% CI = -28.2, -0.6; P = 0.040). No differential effect was found in other outcomes.

conclusionsWhile there are mixed findings about efficacy and effectiveness of depression screening in the existing literature, more population-based observational research is needed to strengthen and support current USPSTF depression screening recommendation statements in the United States. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (#T32AG019134). The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Publicly available data were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Analyses, interpretation, and conclusions are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Division of Health Interview Statistics or NCHS of the CDC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAntidepressive AgentsDepressionDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMass ScreeningMental HealthPractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalencePrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30058984
PMCPMC6084471
OpenAlexW2887704073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.