ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018
Cost-Effectiveness of a Pharmacogenetic Test to Guide Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic evaluations of preventive interventions for self-harm and suicide: a systematic review.Psychological medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Economic effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided prescribing for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Pooled it
- Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in community pharmacy practice: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacogenomic biomarkers as source of evidence of the effectiveness and safety of antidepressant therapy.BMC psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Pooled it
- Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing and polypharmacy across age groups in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a retrospective study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Towards a Multi-sectoral Approach to Population Health: A Scoping Review of Cross-sectoral Evaluations of Health Interventions.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- Multi-Gene Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Community-Based Setting Is Feasible and Reduces Total Healthcare Costs.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Analyzing pharmacogenetics cost effectiveness and savings across common health conditions in the United States.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Review
- An Assessment of Real-World Evidence and Other Sources Supporting Payer Coverage Decisions for Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Polypharmacy and pharmacogenomics in high-acuity behavioral health care for autism spectrum disorder: a retrospective study.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- A Canadian Simulation Model for Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Review
- Precision pharmacotherapy of atomoxetine in children with ADHD: how to ensure the right dose for the right person?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype-guided optimization of major depression treatment in Qatar.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided treatment for major depression.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- Application of Pharmacogenomics Testing in a Community-based Facility.Hospital pharmacy · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of pharmacogenomics on the response and remission of treatment-resistant depression: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.General psychiatry · 2023Article
- A Promising Approach to Optimizing Sequential Treatment Decisions for Depression: Markov Decision Process.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent clinical trials indicate that pharmacogenetic-guided treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) results in higher treatment response rates by genetically matching patients to medications and avoiding a trial-and-error process.
objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a pharmacogenetic test (IDGx) that has demonstrated effectiveness compared with standard of care (SOC) medication management among patients with varied MDD severity.
methodsData from a large prospective, randomized controlled trial of treatment-naive patients or patients with inadequately controlled MDD in general practice and psychiatric treatment settings were used to build a Markov state-transition probability model. Analyses were conducted from the societal perspective. Treatment response rates, mortality rates, direct and indirect medical costs, and utility inputs were derived from the reference study and published scientific literature. The cost of the pharmacogenetic test was $2,000. A 3% discount rate was used to discount costs and effects. Univariate one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect of input parameters on net monetary benefit.
resultsFor moderate to severe MDD, the model estimated a cumulative effect over 3 years of 2.07 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for the pharmacogenetic-guided treatment group and 1.97 QALYs for the SOC group, including a lower probability of death from suicide (0.328% and 0.351%, respectively). Total costs over 3 years were $44,697 (IDGx) and $47,295 (SOC). This difference includes a savings of $2,918 in direct medical costs and $1,680 in indirect costs. Results were more pronounced when only severely depressed patients were evaluated.
conclusionsPharmacogenetic testing among moderate to severe MDD patients improved QALYs and resulted in cost savings. Sensitivity analyses supported the robust nature of the current findings of the dominant IDGx test to guide treatment. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this analysis was provided by AltheaDx, which is the manufacturer of the IDgenetix test. AltheaDx personnel assisted in the study design, data collection, and review of the manuscript. Maciel and Garces are employed by AltheaDx. Groessl has received funding as a consultant from American Specialty Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.