ArticleJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2018
Intra-abdominal complications following intestinal anastomoses by suture and staple techniques in dogs.
Article in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and surgical management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Review
- Stapled enterectomy reduces surgical time when compared with sutured enterectomy: a retrospective review of 54 cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Double-layer adhesives for preventing anastomotic leakage and reducing post-surgical adhesion.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Retrospective evaluation of a hand-sewn side-to-side intestinal anastomosis technique in dogs and cats.Open veterinary journal · 2023Article
- Associations of abdominal discomfort and length of clinical signs with surgical procedure in 181 cases of canine small intestinal foreign body obstruction.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
- Ultrasonographic assessment of early leakage in intestinal sutures in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Clinical findings and patient outcomes following surgical treatment of chronic gastrointestinal foreign body obstructions in dogs and cats: 72 cases (2010-2020).Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2022Article
- Intestinal dehiscence and mortality in cats undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Comparison of surgeon experience using simple interrupted and simple continuous suture patterns in intestinal resection and anastomosis.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2022Article
- Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2022Article
- Comparative efficacy of gambee and single interrupted suture patterns in reducing complications after canine enterotomy.Veterinary evidenceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the incidence of intra-abdominal complications in dogs following resection and functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA) versus anastomosis with an end-to-end sutured technique for treatment of enteric lesions. DESIGN Multicenter, retrospective descriptive cohort study. ANIMALS 180 dogs. PROCEDURES Medical records of dogs undergoing intestinal resection and anastomosis at 3 nonaffiliated private practice specialty centers were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative clinical variables, indication for surgery, surgical technique (sutured end-to-end anastomosis vs FEESA), and evidence of postoperative anastomosis site leakage (dehiscence) were recorded. Variables of interest were analyzed for associations with dehiscence. RESULTS Dehiscence rates of sutured and stapled anastomoses were 12 of 93 (13%) and 4 of 87 (5%), respectively; odds of postoperative dehiscence were significantly lower for dogs with FEESAs than for dogs with sutured anastomoses (OR, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.94). Among dogs that underwent surgery for treatment of intestinal dehiscence after surgery at another facility, subsequent dehiscence developed in 3 of 5 with sutured anastomoses and 0 of 11 with stapled anastomoses. Dehiscence rates varied significantly among clinics. No other variable was associated with risk of dehiscence. Eleven of 16 dogs with dehiscence were euthanized without additional surgery. Impaction at the anastomosis site was identified months or years after surgery in 3 dogs (4 anastomosis sites) that had FEESAs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Odds for dehiscence were significantly greater for sutured end-to-end anastomoses than FEESAs, and dogs undergoing surgery for previous dehiscence were significantly more likely to experience a subsequent dehiscence with a sutured anastomosis. However, variability of procedure types and dehiscence rates among clinics suggested further research is needed to confirm these findings. Obstruction at the anastomosis site was identified as a potential long-term complication of FEESA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.